Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-18T13:07:35.466Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

18 - Manuscripts and the Making of the New Testament

from Part IV - Contested Cultures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 August 2023

By
Tommy Wasserman
Edited by
Bruce W. Longenecker  and
David E. Wilhite
Bruce W. Longenecker
Affiliation:
Baylor University, Texas
David E. Wilhite
Affiliation:
Baylor University, Texas
Get access

Summary

The authors of ancient Christian literature all wrote their distinct stories about Jesus, their letters to churches, and other types of literature on manuscripts. Consequently, any serious study of ancient Christianity must take textual transmission into account.1 Since the New Testament books, in particular, became widely copied and read, the extant textual tradition is rich in comparison with other ancient works (a cause for optimism as to the recovery of the text).2 Today, no less than 6,014 manuscripts (141 papyri, 324 majuscules, 3,011 minuscules, and 2,538 lectionaries) have been assigned a Gregory-Aland number in the official registry of manuscripts maintained by the Institut für neutestamentliche Textforschung (INTF) in Münster.3 In addition, there are the early translations, in particular in Latin, Syriac, and Coptic, and the citations of Church Fathers to take into account.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge History of Ancient Christianity , pp. 419 - 442
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Select Bibliography

Aland, Barbara, Aland, Kurt, Mink, Gerd, Strutwolf, Holger, and Wachtel, Klaus (eds.) Novum Testamentum Graecum: Editio Critica Maior, vol. 4.1, Catholic Letters: Text, 2nd ed. (Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft, 2013).Google Scholar
Aland, Kurt (ed.) Kurzgeftaßte Liste der griechischen Handschriften des Neuen Testaments (ANTF 1; Berlin: De Gruyter, 1995). Available online at https://ntvmr.uni-muenster.de/liste.Google Scholar
Aland, Kurt and Aland, Barbara. The Text of the New Testament: An Introduction to the Critical Editions and to the Theory and Practice of Modern Textual Criticism. Translated by Rhodes, Erroll F., 2nd ed. (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1989).Google Scholar
Barker, Don. “The dating of New Testament papyri,” New Testament Studies 57 (2011), 571–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bovon, François. Luke 2: A Commentary on the Gospel of Luke 9:51–19:27 (Hermeneia; Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Carlson, Stephen C. “A bias at the heart of the Coherence-Based Genealogical Method,” Journal of Biblical Literature 139 (2020), 319–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cerquiglini, Bernard. In Praise of the Variant: A Critical History of Philology. Translated by Wing, Betsy (Parallax: Re-Visions of Culture and Society; Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 1992). French orig. Éloge de la variante: Histoire critique de la philologie (Paris: Seuil, 1989).Google Scholar
Clark, Kenneth W. “The effect of recent textual criticism upon New Testament studies.” Pages 27–50 in The Background of the New Testament and Its Eschatology. Edited by Davies, W. D. and Daube, David (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1954).Google Scholar
Ehrman, Bart D. The Orthodox Corruption of Scripture: The Effect of Early Christological Controversies on the Text of the New Testament (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993; 2nd ed., 2011).Google Scholar
Ehrman, Bart D. “The text as window: New Testament manuscripts and the social history of early Christianity.” Pages 803–30 in The Text of the New Testament in Contemporary Research: Essays on the Status Quaestionis. Edited by Ehrman, Bart D. and Holmes, Michael W., 2nd ed. (NTTSD 42; Leiden: Brill, 2013).Google Scholar
Epp, Eldon J. “Decision points in past, present, and future New Testament textual criticism.” Pages 75–126 in The New Testament and Its Modern Interpreters. Edited by Epp, Eldon J. and MacRae, George W. (Philadelphia: Fortress Press; Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Epp, Eldon J. “It’s all about variants: A variant-conscious approach to New Testament textual criticism,” Harvard Theological Review 100 (2007), 275–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epp, Eldon J. “The multivalence of the term ‘original text’ in New Testament textual criticism,” Harvard Theological Review 92 (1999), 245–81.Google Scholar
Epp, Eldon J. “Textual clusters: Their past and future in New Testament textual criticism.” Pages 519–77 in The Text of the New Testament in Contemporary Research: Essays on the Status Quaestionis. Edited by Ehrman, Bart D. and Holmes, Michael W., 2nd ed. (NTTSD 42; Leiden: Brill, 2013).Google Scholar
Epp, Eldon J. The Theological Tendency of Codex Bezae Cantabrigiensis in Acts (SNTSMS 3; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1966).Google Scholar
Epp, Eldon J. “The twentieth-century interlude in New Testament textual criticism,” Journal of Biblical Literature 93 (1974), 386–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Richard J. In Defense of History (London: Granta Books, 1997).Google Scholar
Feine, Paul and Behm, Johannes. Introduction to the New Testament. Edited by Kümmel, Werner G.. Translated by Mattill, A. J., 14th ed. (Nashville: Abingdon, 1966).Google Scholar
Gäbel, Georg. “‘Western text’, ‘D-text cluster,’ ‘Bezan trajectory,’ or what else? – A preliminary study.” Pages 83–136 in Novum Testamentum Graecum: Editio Critica Maior, vol. 3.3, Acts of the Apostles: Studies. Edited by Strutwolf, Holger, Gäbel, Georg, Hüffmeier, Annette, Mink, Gerd, and Wachtel, Klaus (Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft, 2017).Google Scholar
Gurry, Peter J. “The number of variants in the Greek New Testament: A proposed estimate,” New Testament Studies 62 (2015), 97–121.Google Scholar
Gurry, Peter and Wasserman, Tommy, “Textual criticism and the Editio Critica Maior of James.” Pages 209–29 in Reading the Epistle of James: A Resource for Students. Edited by Mason, Eric F. and Lockett, Darian R. (RBS 94; Atlanta: SBL Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Head, Peter. “Textual criticism and the Synoptic Problem.” Pages 115–56 in New Studies in the Synoptic Problem: Oxford Conference 2008. Essays in Honor of Christopher M. Tuckett. Edited by Foster, Paul, Gregory, Andrew F., Kloppenborg, John S., and Verheyden, Jozef (BETL 239; Leuven: Peeters, 2011).Google Scholar
Strutwolf, Holger et al. (eds.) Novum Testamentum Graecum: Editio Critica Maior, vol. 3.1.1, Acts of the Apostles: Text, Chapters 1–14 (Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft, 2017).Google Scholar
Holmes, Michael W. “New Testament textual criticism in 2020: A (selective) survey of the Status Quaestionis,” Early Christianity 11 (2020), 3–20.Google Scholar
Housman, Alfred E. “The application of thought to textual criticism,” Proceedings of the Classical Association 18 (1921), 67–84.Google Scholar
Keith, Chris. The Gospel as Manuscript: An Early History of the Jesus Tradition as Material Artifact (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenyon, Frederic G. “Hesychius and the text of the New Testament.” Pages 245–50 in Mémorial Lagrange. Edited by Vincent, L. H. (Paris: J. Gabalda, 1940).Google Scholar
Knust, Jennifer W. “In pursuit of a singular text: New Testament textual criticism and the desire for the true original,” Religion Compass 2 (2008), 180–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knust, Jennifer W. and Wasserman, Tommy, To Cast the First Stone: The Transmission of a Gospel Story (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Kraft, Robert A. “The ‘textual mechanics’ of early Jewish LXX/OG papyri and fragments.” Pages 51–72 in The Bible as Book: The Transmission of the Greek Text. Edited by McKendrick, Scot and O’Sullivan, Orlaith A. (London: Oak Knoll, 2003).Google Scholar
Larsen, Matthew D. C. “Accidental publication, unfinished texts and the traditional goals of New Testament textual criticism,” Journal for the Study of the New Testament 39.4 (2017), 362–87.Google Scholar
Larsen, Matthew D. C. Gospels Before the Book (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leipziger, Jonas. “Ancient Jewish Greek practices of reading and their material aspects.” Pages 149–76 in Material Aspects of Reading in Ancient and Medieval Cultures: Materiality, Presence and Performance. Edited by Krauß, Anna, Leipziger, Jonas, and Schücking-Jungblut, Friederike (Materiale Textkulturen 26; Berlin: De Gruyter, 2020).Google Scholar
Lundhaug, Hugo and Lied, Liv Ingeborg (eds.) Snapshots of Evolving Traditions: Jewish and Christian Manuscript Culture, Textual Fluidity, and New Philology (TUGAL 175; Berlin: De Gruyter, 2017).Google Scholar
Lundhaug, Hugo and Lied, Liv Ingeborg. “Studying snapshots: On manuscript culture, textual fluidity, and New Philology.” Pages 1–19 in Snapshots of Evolving Traditions: Jewish and Christian Manuscript Culture, Textual Fluidity, and New Philology. Edited by Lundhaug, Hugo and Lied, Liv Ingeborg (TUGAL 175; Berlin: De Gruyter, 2017).Google Scholar
Martin, Victor and Kasser, Rodolphe. Papyrus Bodmer XIV: Évangile de Luc chap. 3–24 (Geneva: Bibliotheca Bodmeriana, 1961).Google Scholar
Martin, Victor and Kasser, Rodolphe. Papyrus Bodmer XV: Évangile de Jean chap. 1–15 (Geneva: Bibliotheca Bodmeriana, 1961).Google Scholar
Martini, Carlo M. Il problema della recensionalità del codice B alla luca del papiro Bodmer XIV (AnBib 26; Rome: Biblical Institute Press, 1966).Google Scholar
Metzger, Bruce M. The Text of the New Testament: Its Transmission, Corruption and Restoration (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1964).Google Scholar
Metzger, Bruce M. A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament, 2nd ed. (New York: United Bible Societies, 1994).Google Scholar
Mink, Gerd. “Problems of a highly contaminated tradition: The New Testament; stemmata of variants as a source of a genealogy for witnesses.” Pages 13–85 in Studies in Stemmatology II. Edited by van Reenen, Pieter, den Hollander, August, and van Mulken, Margot (Philadelphia: Benjamins, 2004).Google Scholar
Mink, Gerd. “Remarks on Carlson, ‘A bias at the heart of the CBGM,’” INTF blog, 28 August 2020. http://ntvmr.uni-muenster.de/intfblog/-/blogs/remarks-on-carlson-a-bias-at-the-heart-of-the-cbgm-guest-post-by-gerd-mink-.Google Scholar
Mink, Gerd. “Zur Stemmatisierung neutestamentlicher Handschriften.” Pages 100–14 in Bericht der Hermann Kunst-Stiftung zur Förderung der neutestamentlichen Textforschung für die Jahre 1979–1981 (Münster: Institut für neutestamentliche Textforschung, 1982).Google Scholar
Nichols, Stephen. “Introduction: Philology in a manuscript culture,” Speculum 65 (1990), 1–10.Google Scholar
Nongbri, Brent. God’s Library: The Archaeology of the Earliest Christian Manuscripts (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Nongbri, Brent. “Reconsidering the place of Papyrus Bodmer XIV–XV (𝔓75) in the textual criticism of the New Testament,” Journal of Biblical Literature 135 (2016), 405–37.Google Scholar
Orsini, Pasquale. Manoscritti in maiuscola biblica: Materiali per un aggiornamento (Studi archeol., artistici, fil. e storici; Cassino: Università di Cassino, 2005).Google Scholar
Orsini, Pasquale and Clarysse, Willy. “Early New Testament manuscripts and their dates: A critique of theological paleography,” Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses 88 (2012), 433–74.Google Scholar
Parker, David C. “Is ‘living text’ compatible with ‘initial text’? Editing the Gospel of John.” Pages 13–21 in The Textual History of the Greek New Testament: Changing Views in Contemporary Research. Edited by Wachtel, Klaus and Holmes, Michael W. (TCSt 8; Atlanta: SBL Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Parker, David C. The Living Text of the Gospels (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, David C. “Textual criticism and theology,” Expository Times 118 (2007), 583–9.Google Scholar
Porter, Calvin L. “Papyrus Bodmer XV (P75) and the text of Codex Vaticanus,” Journal of Biblical Literature 81.4 (1962), 363–76.Google Scholar
Porter, Calvin L. “A textual analysis of the earliest manuscripts of the Gospel of John” (Ph.D. diss., Duke University, 1961).Google Scholar
Prothro, James B. “Myths about classical literature: Responsibly comparing the New Testament to ancient works.” Pages 70–89 in Myths and Mistakes in New Testament Textual Criticism. Edited by Hixson, Elijah and Gurry, Peter J. (Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press Academic, 2019).Google Scholar
Roberts, C. H. “An early papyrus of the First Gospel,” Harvard Theological Review 46 (1953), 233–7.Google Scholar
Roberts, C. H. Manuscript, Society and Belief in Early Christian Egypt (London: Oxford University Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Schmid, Ulrich B. “Marcion and the textual history of Romans: Editorial activity and early editions of the New Testament.” Pages 99–113 in Papers Presented at the Sixteenth International Conference on Patristic Studies Held in Oxford 2011, vol. 2, Biblical Quotations in Patristic Texts. Edited by Mellerin, Laurence and Houghton, Hugh A. G. (Studia Patristica 54; Leuven: Peeters, 2013).Google Scholar
Schmid, Ulrich B. “Scribes and variants – Sociology and typology.” Pages 1–23 in Textual Variation: Theological and Social Tendencies? Edited by Houghton, H. A. G. and Parker, David C. (TS 3.5; Piscataway, NJ: Gorgias, 2008).Google Scholar
Strutwolf, Holger. “Original text and textual history.” Pages 23–42 in The Textual History of the Greek New Testament: Changing Views in Contemporary Research. Edited by Wachtel, Klaus and Holmes, Michael W. (TCSt 8; Atlanta: SBL Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Tov, Emanuel. Scribal Practices and Approaches Reflected in the Texts Found in the Judean Desert. Leiden: Brill, 2004.Google Scholar
Tov, Emanuel (ed.) with the collaboration of Kraft, R. A. and Parsons, P. J.. The Greek Minor Prophets Scroll from Nahal Hever (8HevXIIgr) (DJD 8; Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Wachtel, Klaus. “Colwell revisited: Grouping New Testament manuscripts.” Pages 31–43 in The New Testament in Early Christianity: Proceedings of the Lille Colloquium, July 2000. Edited by Amphoux, Christian-Bernard and Elliott, J. K. (HTB 6; Lausanne: Zèbre, 2003).Google Scholar
Wachtel, Klaus. “On the relationship of the ‘Western text’ and the Byzantine tradition of Acts – A plea against the text-type concept.” Pages 137–48 in Novum Testamentum Graecum: Editio Critica Maior, vol. 3.3, Acts of the Apostles: Studies. Edited by Strutwolf, Holger, Gäbel, Georg, Hüffmeier, Annette, Mink, Gerd, and Wachtel, Klaus (Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft, 2017).Google Scholar
Wasserman, Tommy. “Alexandrian text,” Bible Odyssey. www.bibleodyssey.org/places/related-articles/alexandrian-text.Google Scholar
Wasserman, Tommy. “Bringing sisters back together (Luke 10:41–42),” Journal of Biblical Literature 137 (2018), 439–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasserman, Tommy. “The Coherence Based Genealogical Method as a tool for explaining textual changes in the Greek New Testament,” Novum Testamentum 57 (2015), 206–18.Google Scholar
Wasserman, Tommy. “Criteria for evaluating readings in New Testament textual criticism.” Pages 595–607 in The Text of the New Testament in Contemporary Research: Essays on the Status Quaestionis. Edited by Ehrman, Bart D. and Holmes, Michael W., 2nd ed (NTTSD 42; Leiden: Brill, 2013).Google Scholar
Wasserman, Tommy. The Epistle of Jude: Its Text and Transmission (ConBNT 43; Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International, 2006).Google Scholar
Wasserman, Tommy. “Historical and philological correlations and the CBGM as applied to Mark 1:1,” Journal of Biblical Textual Criticism 20 (2015), 1–11.Google Scholar
Wasserman, Tommy. “The implications of textual criticism for understanding the ‘original text.’” Pages 77–96 in Mark and Matthew I: Comparative Readings. Understanding the Earliest Gospels in Their First-Century Settings. Edited by Becker, Eve-Marie and Runesson, Anders (WUNT 1.271; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2011).Google Scholar
Wasserman, Tommy. “Methods of evaluating textual relationships: From Bengel to the CBGM and beyond.” Pages 333–61 in The Future of Textual Scholarship on the New Testament. Edited by Allen, Garrick V. (WUNT 1.417; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2019).Google Scholar
Wasserman, Tommy. “Misquoting manuscripts? The orthodox corruption of Scripture revisited.” Pages 325–50 in The Making of Christianity: Conflicts, Contacts, and Constructions. Essays in Honor of Bengt Holmberg. Edited by Zetterholm, Magnus and Byrskog, Samuel (ConBNT 47; Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 2012).Google Scholar
Wasserman, Tommy. “Papyrus 72 and the Bodmer Miscellaneous Codex,” New Testament Studies 51 (2005), 137–54.Google Scholar
Wasserman, Tommy. “Scribal alterations and the reception of Jesus in early manuscripts of the Gospels.” Pages 305–27 in The Reception of Jesus in the First Three Centuries, vol. 2. Edited by Schröter, Jens and Jacobi, Christine (Edinburgh: T&T Clark; London: Bloomsbury, 2019).Google Scholar
Wasserman, Tommy. “Was there an Alexandrian recension of the living text?” Pages 1–23 in Liturgy and the Living Text: Papers from the Tenth Birmingham Colloquium on the Textual Criticism of the New Testament. Edited by Houghton, H. A. G. (TS 3.16; Piscataway, NJ: Gorgias Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Wasserman, Tommy and Gurry, Peter. A New Approach to Textual Criticism: An Introduction to the Coherence-Based Genealogical Method (RBS 80; Atlanta: SBL Press; Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft, 2017).Google Scholar
Westcott, Brooke Foss and Hort, Fenton John Anthony (eds.) The New Testament in the Original Greek, 2 vols. (London: Macmillan, 1881).Google Scholar
Zuntz, Günther. The Text of the Epistles: A Disquisition upon the Corpus Paulinum. The Schweich Lectures of the British Academy, 1946 (Oxford: Oxford University Press; London: British Academy, 1953).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×