Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-09T05:04:34.938Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Email in healthcare: pros, cons and efficient use

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2024

Stephen Ginn*
Affiliation:
Consultant general adult psychiatrist employed by the Camden and Islington Foundation NHS Trust, London, UK. His clinical work covers mental health in primary care and mood disorders in secondary care.
*
Correspondence Stephen Ginn. Email: stephen.ginn3@nhs.net

Summary

Email is a major means of communication in healthcare and it facilitates the fast delivery of messages and information. But email's ubiquity has brought challenges. It has changed the way we get things done, and working days can be dictated by the receipt and reply of multiple email messages, which drown out other priorities. This article examines email's advantages and disadvantages and, with a focus on healthcare professionals, examines what individuals and organisations can do to ensure email works for us, rather than – as can seem the case – the other way around.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdelrahman, W, Abdelmageed, A (2014) Medical record keeping: clarity, accuracy, and timeliness are essential. BMJ, 348: f7716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akbar, F, Mark, G, Warton, EM, et al (2021) Physicians’ electronic inbox work patterns and factors associated with high inbox work duration. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 28: 923–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allen, D (2019) Getting Things Done: The Art of Stress-Free Productivity. Piakus.Google Scholar
Ayoub, S (2021) ‘Email is a zombie that keeps rising from the dead’: the endless pursuit of Inbox Zero, Guardian, 3 Oct (https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2021/oct/04/email-is-a-zombie-that-keeps-rising-from-the-dead-the-endless-pursuit-of-inbox-zero).Google Scholar
Barley, SR, Meyerson, DE, Grodal, S (2011) E-mail as a source and symbol of stress. Organization Science, 22: 887906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BBC News (2012) Volkswagen turns off Blackberry email after work hours. BBC News, 8 Mar (http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-16314901).Google Scholar
BBC News (2022) NHS IT supplier held to ransom by hackers. BBC News, 11 Aug (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-62506039).Google Scholar
Berners-Lee, M (2020) How Bad Are Bananas? The Carbon Footprint of Everything. Profile books.Google Scholar
Biggin, A (2018) A 21st century plague of biblical proportions. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 54: 1292–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Car, J, Sheikh, A (2004) Email consultations in health care: 1 – scope and effectiveness. BMJ, 329: 435–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooke, M, Williams, SJ, Esain, A (2010) Lean email: applying 5s to emails. BMJ, 330: b5647.Google Scholar
Davidson, M (2007) A low-fi solution to e-mail overload: sentenc.es. Mike Industries, 17 Jul (https://mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2007/07/fight-email-overload-with-sentences).Google Scholar
De Gagne, JC, Yang, Y, Rushton, S, et al (2020) Email use reconsidered in health professions education: viewpoint. JMIR Medical Education, 6(1): e19300.Google ScholarPubMed
Dennis, S, Waterworth, S (2021) Health professionals’ engagement with email – enabler or disrupter? Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 39: 916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (2022) Cyber Security Breaches Survey 2022. DCMS (https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/cyber-security-breaches-survey-2022/cyber-security-breaches-survey-2022).Google Scholar
Forte, T (2022) One-touch to inbox zero: how I spend 17 minutes per day on email. Forte Labs, 25 Jun (https://fortelabs.com/blog/one-touch-to-inbox-zero/).Google Scholar
Golz, C, Peter KA, Zwakhalen SMG, et al (2021) Technostress among health professionals - a multilevel model and group comparisons between settings and professions. Informatics for Health and Social Care, 46: 136–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goyder, C, Atherton, H, Car, M, et al (2015) Email for clinical communication between healthcare professionals. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2: CD007979.Google Scholar
Grawitch, MJ, Werth, PM, Palmer, SN, et al (2018) Self-imposed pressure or organizational norms? Further examination of the construct of workplace telepressure. Stress and Health, 34: 306–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heather, B (2016) NHSMail2 rolled out to 200,000 NHS staff.digitalhealth, 23 Jun (https://www.digitalhealth.net/2016/06/nhsmail-2-rolled-out-to-200000-nhs-staff/).Google Scholar
Hills, L (2011) E-mail netiquette for the medical practice employee: 50 do's and don'ts. Journal of Medical Practice Management, 27: 112–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Jackson, TW, Dawson, R, Wilson, D (2001) The cost of email interruption. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 5: 8192.Google Scholar
Jones, V (2012) Business practices that refuse to die #44: Email trees. vinJones Videos (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QIqA_YKeboc).Google Scholar
Kushlev, K, Dunn, EW (2015) Checking email less frequently reduces stress. Computers in Human Behavior, 43: 220–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lantz, A (1998) Heavy users of electronic mail. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 10: 361–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luu, T, Spiegelman, L, Nykin, D, et al (2022) Implementation of an electronic health record-based messaging system in the emergency department: effects on physician workflow and resident burnout. Journal of Patient Safety, 18: e542–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Malka, ST, Kessler, CS, Abraham, J, et al (2015) Professional e-mail communication among health care providers: proposing evidence-based guidelines. Academic Medicine, 90: 25–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Mann, M (2007) Inbox Zero. Google TechTalks (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z9UjeTMb3Yk).Google Scholar
McGee, S, Clemons, M, Joy, AA, et al (2019) Why “reply All” can push all the wrong buttons. Oncologist, 24: e643–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newport, C (2022) A World without Email: Reimagining Work in an Age of Communication Overload. Portfolio.Google Scholar
Oettl, CA, Beck, K, Raufer, FM, et al (2018) Zero email initiative: a critical review of change management during the introduction of enterprise social networks. Journal of Information Technology Teaching Cases, 8: 172–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radicati Group (2020) Email Statistics Report, 2020–2024. Radicati Group (https://www.radicati.com/?p=16510).Google Scholar
Railey, K, Tuttle, B, Weiss, J (2017) Are you SURE you want to send that? A model for email professionalism in medical education. Journal of Physician Assistant Education, 28: 205–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soucek, R, Moser, K (2010) Coping with information overload in email communication: evaluation of a training intervention. Computers in Human Behavior, 26: 1458–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sowerbutts, H, Fertleman, C (2016) How best to use email with patients. BMJ, 352: h6225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiles, RA, Deppen, SA, Figaro, MK, et al (2007) Behind-the-scenes of patient-centered care: content analysis of electronic messaging among primary care clinic providers and staff. Medical care, 45: 1205–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoltzfus, J (2015) Ditch your inbox? No-email initiatives and what they're for. Techopedia, 31 Aug (https://www.techopedia.com/2/31068/personal-tech/multimedia/ditch-your-inbox-no-email-initiatives-and-what-theyre-for).Google Scholar
Toffler, A (1970) Future Shock. Random House.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.