Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T15:45:02.447Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY APPLIED TO PALEONTOLOGICAL SPECIMENS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2017

Alexander D. Ball ,
Tomasz Goral  and
Seyit A. Kamanli
Alexander D. Ball
Affiliation:
Imaging and Analysis Centre, Core Research Laboratories, The Natural History Museum, London, UK, 〈a.ball@nhm.ac.uk〉, 〈t.goral@nhm.ac.uk〉
Tomasz Goral
Affiliation:
Imaging and Analysis Centre, Core Research Laboratories, The Natural History Museum, London, UK, 〈a.ball@nhm.ac.uk〉, 〈t.goral@nhm.ac.uk〉
Seyit A. Kamanli
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, Surrey, UK, 〈Seyit.Kamanli.2013@live.rhul.ac.uk〉
Get access

Abstract

Confocal laser scanning microscopy is a well-established optical technique allowing for three-dimensional (3-D) visualization of fluorescent specimens with a resolution close to the diffraction limit of light. Thanks to the availability of a wide range of fluorescent dyes and selective staining using antibodies, the technique is commonly used in life sciences as a powerful tool for studying different biological processes, often at the level of single molecules. However, this type of approach is often not applicable for specimens that are preserved in historical slide collections, embedded in amber, or are fossilized, and cannot be exposed to any form of selective staining or other form of destructive treatment. This usually narrows the number of microscopic techniques that can be used to study such specimens to traditional light microscopy or scanning electron microscopy. However, these techniques have their own limitations and cannot fully reveal 3-D structures within such barely accessible samples. Can confocal microscopy be of any help? The answer is positive, and it is due to the fact that many paleontological specimens exhibit a strong inherent autofluorescence that can serve as an excellent source of emitted photons for confocal microscopy visualizations either through reconstruction of the induced autoflourescent signal from the sample, or through reconstruction of the reflected signal from the sample surface. Here, we describe the workflow and methodology involved in acquiring confocal data from a sample and reprocessing the resulting image stack using the image-processing program imageJ before reconstructing the data using the open-source 3-D rendering program, Drishti. This approach opens new possibilities for using confocal microscopy in a nondestructive manner for visualizing complex paleontological material that has never previously been considered as suitable for this type of microscopic technique.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Paleontological Society Papers , Volume 22: Virtual Paleontology , September 2016 , pp. 39 - 55
Copyright
Copyright © 2017, The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andersen, T., Baranov, V., Goral, T., Langton, P., Perkovsky, E., and Sykes, D., 2015, First record of a Chironomidae pupa in amber: Geobios, v. 48, p. 281–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Compton, S.G., Ball, A.D., Collinson, M.E., Hayes, P., Rasnitsyn, A.P., and Ross, A.J., 2010, Ancient fig wasps indicate at least 34 Myr of stasis in their mutualism with fig trees: Biology Letters, v. 6, p. 838–842, DOI:10.1098/rsbl.2010.0389.Google Scholar
Evans, A.R., Harper, I.S., and Sanson, G.D., 2001, Confocal imaging, visualization and 3-D surface measurement of small mammalian teeth: Journal of Microscopy, v. 204, p. 108–119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feist-Burkhardt, S., and Pross., J., 1999, Morphological analysis and description of Middle Jurassic dinoflagellate cyst marker species using confocal laser scanning microscopy, digital optical microscopy and conventional light microscopy: Bulletin du Centre de Recherché Elf Exploration Production, v. 22, p. 103–145.Google Scholar
Haisch, C., 2012, Optical tomography: Annual Review of Analytical Chemistry, v. 5, p. 57–77.Google Scholar
Haug, J.T., Haug, C., Kutschera, V., Mayer, G., Maas, A., Liebau, S., Castellani, C., Wolfram, U., Clarkson, E.N.K., and Waloszek, D., 2011, Autofluorescence imaging: An excellent tool for comparative morphology: Journal of Microscopy, v. 224, p. 259–272.Google Scholar
Hell, S., Reiner, G., Cremer, C., and Stelzer, E.H.K., 1993, Aberrations in confocal fluorescence microscopy induced by mismatches in refractive index: Journal of Microscopy, v. 169, p. 391–405.Google Scholar
Hickman-Lewis, K., Garwood, R.J., Brasier, M.D., Goral, T., Jiang, H., McLoughlin, N., and Wacey, D., 2016, Carbonaceous microstructures from sedimentary laminated chert within the 3.46 Ga Apex Basalt, Chinaman Creek locality, Pilbara, Western Australia: Precambrian Research, v. 278, p. 161–178.Google Scholar
Hochuli, P.A., and Feist-Burkhardt, S., 2013, Angiosperm-like pollen and Afropollis from the Middle Triassic (Anisian) of the Germanic Basin (northern Switzerland): Frontiers in Plant Science, v. 4, p. 344 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00344.Google Scholar
Husiken, J., and Stainier, D.Y.R., 2009, Selective plane illumination microscopy techniques in developmental biology: Development, v. 136, p. 1963–1975.Google Scholar
Kaye, T.G., Falk, A.R., Pittman, M., Sereno, P.C., Martin, L.D., Burnham, D.A., Gong, E., Xu, X., and Wang, Y., 2015, Laser-stimulated fluorescence in paleontology: PLoS ONE, v. 10, p. e0125923 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0125923.Google Scholar
Lee, S., Brown, R.L., and Monroe, W., 2009, Use of confocal laser scanning microscopy in systematics of insects with a comparison of fluorescence from different stains: Systematic Entomology, v. 34, p. 10–14.Google Scholar
Limaye, A., 2012, Drishti: a volume exploration and presentation tool, in Stock, S.R., ed., Proceedings of SPIE Volume 8506, Developments in X-Ray Tomography VIII: San Diego, California, August 12, 2012, p. 85060X, DOI: 10.1117/12.935640.Google Scholar
Marschall, S., Sander, B., Mogensen, M., Jørgensen, T.M., and Andersen, P. E., 2011, Optical coherence tomography—Current technology and applications in clinical and biomedical research: Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, v. 400, p. 2699–2720.Google Scholar
Schindelin, J., Arganda-Carreras, I., Frise, E., Kaynig, V., Longair, M., Pietzsch, T., Preibisch, S., Rueden, C., Saalfeld, S., Schmid, B., Tinevez, J.-Y., White, D.J., Hartenstein, V., Eliceiri, K., Tomancak, P., and Cardona, A., 2012, Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis: Nature Methods, v. 9, p. 676–682.Google Scholar
Schneider, C.A., Rasband, W.S., and Eliceiri, K.W., 2012, NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis: Nature Methods, v. 9, p. 671–675.Google Scholar
Sharpe, J., Ahlgren, U., Perry, P., Hill, B., Ross, A., Hecksher-Sørensen, J., Baldock, R., and Davidson, D., 2002, Optical projection tomography as a tool for 3D microscopy and gene expression studies: Science, v. 296, p. 541–545.Google Scholar
Sheppard, C., and Shotton, D., 1997, Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy: Oxford, UK, BIOS, 106 p.Google Scholar
Shi, C.S., Schopf, J.W., and Kudryavtsev, A.B., 2013, Characterization of the stem anatomy of the Eocene fern Dennstaedtiopsis aerenchymata (Dennstaedtiaceae) by use of confocal laser scanning microscopy: American Journal of Botany, v. 100, p. 1626–1640.Google Scholar
Strullu-Derrien, C., Wawrzyniak, Z., Goral, T., and Kenrick, P., 2015, Fungal colonization of the rooting system of the early land plant Asteroxylon mackiei from the 407-Myr-old Rhynie Chert (Scotland, UK): Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, v. 179, p. 201–213.Google Scholar