Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T15:47:33.182Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: Translation and Validation in University Students

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 April 2014

José Martín-Albo ,
Juan L. Núñez ,
José G. Navarro  and
Fernando Grijalvo
José Martín-Albo*
Affiliation:
Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (Spain)
Juan L. Núñez
Affiliation:
Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (Spain)
José G. Navarro
Affiliation:
Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (Spain)
Fernando Grijalvo
Affiliation:
Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (Spain)
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to José Martín-Albo, Departamento de Psicología y Sociología, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, C/ Santa Juana de Arco, 1 - 35004 Las Palmas (Spain). E-mail: jmartin@dps.ulpgc.es
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The aim of this study was to translate into Spanish and to validate the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES), completed by 420 university students. Confirmatory factor analysis revealed that the model that best fit the data, both in the total sample and in the male and female subsamples, was the one-factor structure with method effects associated with positively worded items. The results indicated high, positive correlations between self-esteem and the five dimensions of self-concept. The scale showed satisfactory levels of internal consistency and temporal stability over a four-week period. Lastly, gender differences were obtained. These findings support the use of the RSES for the assessment of self-esteem in higher education.

El propósito de esta investigación ha sido traducir al español y analizar las propiedades psicométricas de la escala de autoestima de Rosenberg (RSES) en una muestra de estudiantes universitarios. El análisis factorial confirmatorio confirmó que el modelo que mejor se ajusta a los datos tanto en la muestra total como en las submuestras de hombres y mujeres tiene una estructura unifactorial con efectos de método en los ítems formulados en positivo. Los resultados indican correlaciones positivas y fuertes entre la autoestima y cinco dimensiones del autoconcepto. Además, la escala ha mostrado niveles satisfactorios de consistencia interna y estabilidad temporal tras un periodo de cuatro semanas. Finalmente, se han obtenido diferencias de género significativas. Estos resultados apoyan el uso de la RSES para evaluar la autoestima en el contexto educativo universitario.

Keywords

self-esteempsychometric propertiescollege studentsRosenbergautoestimapropiedades psicométricasestudiantes universitariosRosenberg
Type
Articles
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , November 2007 , pp. 458 - 467
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alonso, J., & Román, J.M. (2005). Prácticas educativas familiares y autoestima. Psicothema, 17, 76–82.Google Scholar
Atienza, F.L., Moreno, Y., & Balaguer, I. (2000). Análisis de la dimensionalidad de la Escala de Autoestima de Rosenberg en una muestra de adolescentes valencianos. Revista de Psicología Universitas Tarraconensis, 22, 29–42.Google Scholar
Baños, R.M., & Guillén, V. (2000). Psychometric characteristics in normal and social phobic simples for a Spanish version of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Psychological Reports, 87, 269–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollen, K., & Long, J.S. (1994). Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Brislin, R.W. (1986). The wording and translation of research instruments. In Lonner, W. & Berry, J. (Eds.), Field methods in cross-cultural research (pp. 137–164). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Carmines, E.G., & Zeller, R.A. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corwyn, R.F. (2000). The factor structure of global self-esteem among adolescents and adults. Journal of Research in Personality, 34, 357–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, S.T., & Hamid, P.N. (1995). An error in the use of translated scales: The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale for Chinese. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 81, 431–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiz, M.R., & Oyón, M.J. (1998). Influencia de la autoestima y su repercusión en el rendimiento académico de los adolescentes. Estudios de Pedagogía y Psicología, 10, 27–74.Google Scholar
Gana, K., Alaphilippe, D., & Baillo, D. (2005). Factorial structure of the French version of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale among the elderly. International Journal of Testing, 5, 169–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garaigordobil, M., Durá, A., & Pérez, J.I. (2005). Síntomas psicopatológicos, problemas de conducta y autoconcepto-autoestima: un estudio con adolescentes de 14 a 17 años. Anuario de Psicología Clínica y de la Salud, 1, 53–63.Google Scholar
García, F., & Musitu, G. (2001). AF5, Autoconcepto Forma 5. Madrid: TEA.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, R.E. (1986). Dimensionality of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 1, 253–264.Google Scholar
González-Pienda, J., Núñez, J.C., González-Pumariega, S., & García, M.S. (1997). Autoconcepto, autoestima y aprendizaje escolar. Psicothema, 9, 271–289.Google Scholar
Greenberger, E., Chen, Ch., Dmitrieva, J., & Farruggia, S.P. (2003). Item-wording and the dimensionality of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: Do they matter? Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 1241–1254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hensley, W.E., & Roberts, M.K. (1976). Dimensions of Rosenberg's Self-Esteem Scale. Psychological Reports, 38, 583–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horan, P.M., DiStefano, C., & Motl, R.W. (2003). Wording effects in self-esteem scales: Methodological artifact or response style? Structural Equation Modeling, 10, 435–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, L., & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jöreskog, K.G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago: Scientific Software International.Google Scholar
Kline, R.B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Lance, C.E., Noble, C.L., & Scullen, S.E. (2002). A critique of the correlated trait-correlated method and correlated uniqueness models for multitrait-multimethod data. Psychological Methods, 7, 228–244.Google ScholarPubMed
Marsh, H.W. (1996). Positive and negative self-esteem: A substantively meaningful distinction or artifactors? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 810–819.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mestre, M.V., García, R., Frías, D., & Llorca, V. (1992). Autoestima, depresión y variables escolares: un estudio longitudinal infancia-adolescencia. Revista de Psicología de la Educación, 4, 51–65.Google Scholar
Motl, R.W. & DiStefano, C. (2002). Longitudinal invariance of self-esteem and methods effects associated with negatively worded items. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 562–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musitu, G., Román, J.M., & Gracia, E. (1988). Familia y educación. Barcelona: Labor.Google Scholar
Núñez, J.C., González-Pienda, J.A., García, M., González-Pumariega, S., Roces, C., Álvarez, L., & González, M.C. (1998). Estrategias de aprendizaje, autoconcepto y rendimiento académico. Psicothema, 10, 97–109.Google Scholar
Núñez, J.L., Martín-Albo, J., & Navarro, J.G. (2005). Validación de la versión española de la Échelle de Motivation en Éducation (EME). Psicothema, 17, 344–349.Google Scholar
Parra, A., Oliva, A., & Sánchez, I. (2004). Evolución y determinantes de la autoestima durante los años adolescentes. Anuario de Psicología, 35, 331–346.Google Scholar
Pastor, A., Navarro, E., Tomás, J.M., & Oliver, A. (1997). Efectos de método en escalas de personalidad: la escala de autoestima de Rosenberg. Psicológica, 18, 269–283.Google Scholar
Prezza, M., Trombaccia, F.R., & Armento, L. (1997). La scala dell'autostima di Rosenberg: traduzione e validazione italiana. Bollettino di Psicologia Applicata, 223, 35–44.Google Scholar
Pullman, H., & Allik, J. (2000). The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: Its dimensionality, stability and personality correlates in Estonia. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 701–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purkey, W.W. (1970). Self-concept and school achievement. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Quilty, L.C., Oakman, J.M., & Risko, E. (2006). Correlates of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale method effects. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 99–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez, S., Cabanach, R.G., Valle, A., Núñez, J.C., & González-Pienda, J.A. (2004). Diferencias en el uso de self-handicapping y pesimismo defensivo y sus relaciones con las metas de logro, la autoestima y las estrategias de autorregulación. Psicothema, 16, 625–631.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, M. (1989). Society and the adolescent self-image. (Rev. ed.). Middeltown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Salgado, J.F., & Iglesias, M. (1995). Estructura factorial de la Escala de Autoestima de Rosenberg: un análisis factorial confirmatorio. Psicológica, 16, 441–454.Google Scholar
Sánchez, E., & Barrón, A. (2003). Social psychology of mental health: The social structure and personality perspective. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 6, 3–11.Google Scholar
Santos, P.J., & Maia, J. (2003). Análise factorial confirmatória e validaçao preliminar de uma versao portuguesa da escala de auto-estima de Rosenberg. Psicologia: Teoria, Investigaçao e Prática, 2, 253–268.Google Scholar
Schmitt, D.P., & Allik, J. (2005). Simultaneous administration of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale in 53 nations: Exploring the universal and culture-specific features of global selfesteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 623–642.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shapurian, R., Hojat, M., & Nayerahmadi, H. (1987). Psychometric characteristics and dimensionality of a Persian version of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 65, 27–34.Google Scholar
Shavelson, J., Hubner, J.J., & Stanton, G.C. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46, 407–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomás, J.M., Hontangas, P.M., & Oliver, A. (2000). Linear confirmatory factor models to evaluate multitrait-multimethod matrices: The effects of number of indicators and correlation among methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 35, 469–499.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomás, J.M., & Oliver, A. (1999). Rosenberg's Self-Esteem Scale: Two factors or method effects. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 84–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallieres, E.F., & Vallerand, R.J. (1990). Traduction et validation Canadienne-Française de l'Echelle de l'Estime de soi de Rosenberg. International Journal of Psychology, 25, 305–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vázquez, A.J., Jiménez, R., & Vázquez-Morejón, R. (2004). Escala de autoestima de Rosenberg: fiabilidad y validez en población clínica española. Apuntes de Psicología, 22, 247–255.Google Scholar
Wang, J., Siegal, H.A., Falck, R.S., & Carlson, R.G. (2001). Factorial structure of Rosenberg's Self-Esteem Scale among crack-cocaine drug users. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 275–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar