Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-31T16:35:24.063Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A one-DOF compliant gripper mechanism with four identical twofold-symmetric Bricard linkages

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2022

Kunjing Chen
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, 350108, China
Tianxiang Lai
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, 350108, China
Fufu Yang*
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, 350108, China Fujian Province Digital Design Center for Manufacturing, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350108, China
Jun Zhang
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, 350108, China Fujian Province Digital Design Center for Manufacturing, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350108, China
Ligang Yao
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, 350108, China Fujian Province Digital Design Center for Manufacturing, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350108, China
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: yangfufu@fzu.edu.cn

Abstract

Gripper is one of the most important parts of robot because of contacting with workpieces directly and has attracted lots of research interests. However, the existing grippers are either simple in function or complex in structure. In this paper, we will propose a one-DOF gripper based on a compliant mechanism with four identical twofold-symmetric Bricard linkages. A mobile network with four identical twofold-symmetric Bricard linkages with particular design parameters is constructed at first. Kinematics, such as mobility, singularity, and folding performance, is then analyzed to show the potential of realizing the function of grasping. The result is demonstrated with a physical prototype. To simplify the fabricating process, a compliant mechanism of the network is designed and fabricated with a single polypropylene board, and the grasping function is realized by a cable-driven scheme. Some grasping experiments are carried out on different types of objects which shows that the proposed and fabricated four-figure gripper is simple in structure and has a great grasping function. The work provides a new idea for the design of grippers with low cost, simple structure, and rich functions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

#

Kunjing Chen and Tianxiang Lai contribute equally to the paper.

References

Kocabas, H., “Gripper design with spherical parallelogram mechanism,” J. Mech. Des. 131(7), 075001 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, Y., Zhang, C., Cao, C., Dong, Y., and Liu, Y., “Kinematics and dynamics of a novel hybrid manipulator,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. C: J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 230(10), 16441657 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honarpardaz, M., Tarkian, M., Olvander, J. and Feng, X., “Finger design automation for industrial robot grippers: A review,” Robot. Auton. Syst. 87, 104119 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maggi, M., Mantriota, G. and Reina, G., “Introducing POLYPUS: A novel adaptive vacuum gripper,” Mech. Mach. Theory 167(2), 104483 (2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, X. Y., Wang, H. P., Tian, Y. and Zheng, G., “Disturbance observer-based adaptive boundary iterative learning control for a rigid-flexible manipulator with input backlash and endpoint constraint,” Int. J. Adapt. Control Signal Process. 34(9), 1220–1241 (2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, C., Huang, K., Cheng, H., Li, Y. and Su, C.-Y., “Haptic identification by ELM-controlled uncertain manipulator,” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst. 47(8), 23982409 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mukherjee, S., Mahapatra, A., Kumar, A. and Chatterjee, A., “Study of grasp-energy based optimal distribution of contact forces on a humanoid robotic hand during object grasp,” Robotica 40(5), 15011526 (2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shintake, J., Cacucciolo, V., Floreano, D. and Shea, H., “Soft robotic grippers,” Adv. Mater. 30(29), 1707035(2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abondance, S., Teeple, C. B. and Wood, R. J., “A dexterous soft robotic hand for delicate in-hand manipulation,” IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 5(4), 55025509 (2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, W., Seo, S. and Bae, J., “A hybrid gripper with soft material and rigid structures,” IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 4(1), 6572 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, X. J. and Oseyemi, A. E., “A herringbone soft pneu-net actuator for enhanced conformal gripping,” Robotica 40(5), 13451360 (2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardin-Catalan, D., Ceppetelli, S., del Pobil, A. P. and Morales, A., “Design and analysis of a variable-stiffness robotic gripper,” Alex. Eng. J. 61(2), 12351248 (2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shang, Z. F., Ma, J. Y., You, Z. and Wang, S., “A fol dable manipulator with tunable stiffness based on braided structure,” J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 108(2), 316–325 (2019).Google Scholar
Mathew, B. P., Devasia, F., Asok, A., Jayadevu, P. R. and Baby, R., “Implementation of an origami inspired gripper robot for picking objects of variable geometry,” Mater. Today: Proc. 58, 176183 (2022).Google Scholar
Jeong, D. and Lee, K., “Des ign and analysis of an origami-based three-finger manipulator,” Robotica 36(2), 261–274 (2017).Google Scholar
Zhang, K., Zhu, Y., Lou, C., Zheng, P. and Kovač, M., “A Design and Fabrication Approach for Pneumatic Soft Robotic Arms Using 3D Printed Origami Skeletons,” In: 2nd IEEE International Conference on Soft Robotics, (IEEE, 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, C. Y., Maiolino, P. and You, Z., “A 3D-printable robotic gripper based on thick panel origami,” Front. Robot. AI 8(730227), 112 (2021).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hota, R. K. and Kumar, C. S., “Effect of design parameters on strong and immobilizing grasps with an underactuated robotic hand,” Robotica 40, 117 (2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Su, C., Wang, R., Lu, T. and Wang, S., “SAU-RFC hand: A novel self-adaptive underactuated robot hand with rigid-flexible coupling fingers,” Robotica 4, 119 (2022).Google Scholar
Marwan, Q. M., Chua, S. C. and Kwek, L. C., “Comprehensive review on reaching and grasping of objects in robotics,” Robotica 39, 134 (2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mavroidis, C. and Roth, B., “New and revised overconstrained mechanisms,” J. Mech. Des. 117(1), 7582 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shen, H., Huang, H. L. and Ji, T., “Normalized-constrained approach for joint clearance design of deployable overconstrained Myard 5R mechanism,” J. Adv. Mech. Des. Syst. Manuf. 9(5), 15-00386(2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, C. Y., Chen, Y. and Chen, I., “Kinematic study of the original and revised general line-symmetric Bricard 6R linkages,” J. Mech. Robot. 6(3), 031002(2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feng, H., Chen, Y., Dai, J. S. and Gogu, G., “Kinematic study of the general plane-symmetric Bricard linkage and its bifurcation variations,” Mech. Mach. Theory 116(1), 89104 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, F. F. and Chen, K. J., “General kinematic solutions of twofold-symmetric Bricard 6R linkage,” J. Tianjin Univ 54(11), 11681178 (2021), in Chinese.Google Scholar
Song, X., Guo, H., Liu, R., Meng, F., Chen, Q., Xu, Y. and Liu, R., “Mobility analysis of the threefold-symmetric Bricard linkage and its network,” J. Mech. Robot 12(1), 011013(2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, D., Li, E., Liang, Z. and Gao, Z., “Design and tension modeling of a novel cable-driven rigid snake-like manipulator,” J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 99(2), 211228 (2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, K. J., Yang, F. F. and Zhang, J., “Kinematics of a One-DOF Four-Finger Gripper Constructed with Two-Fold Symmetric Bricard Linkages,” In: The 14th International Conference on Intelligent Robotics and Applications, Yantai, China, ICIRA, Part III, LNAI 13015 (2021) pp. 728738.Google Scholar
Denavit, J. and Hartenberg, R. S., “A kinematic notation for lower-pair mechanisms,” ASME J. Appl. Mech. 22(2), 215221 (1955).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, L. L. and Midha, A., “A loop-closure theory for the analysis and synthesis of compliant mechanisms,” ASME J. Mech. Des. 118(1), 121125 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wohlhart, K., “Screw Spaces and Connectivities in Multiloop Linkages,” In: 9th International Symposium on Advances in Robot Kinematics, Springer, Sestri Levante, Italy (2004) pp. 97–104.Google Scholar
Dai, J. S., “Finite displacement screw operators with embedded chasles’ motion,” J. Mech. Robot. 4(4), 041002 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, F., Chen, Y., Kang, R. and Ma, J., “Truss transformation method to obtain the non-overconstrained forms of 3D overconstrained linkages,” Mech. Mach. Theory 102, 149166 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellegrino, S. and Calladine, C. R., “Matrix analysis of statically and kinematically indeterminate frameworks,” Int. J. Solids Struct. 22(4), 409428 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, P. and Pellegrino, S., “Computation of kinematic paths and bifurcation points,” Int. J. Solids Struct. 37(46-47), 70037027 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, L. L. and Midha, A., “A method for the design of compliant mechanisms with small-length flexural pivots,” Trans. ASME 116(1), 280290 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yong, Y. K., Lu, T. F. and Handley, D. C., “Review of circular flexure hinge design equations and derivation of empirical formulations,” Precis. Eng. 32(2), 6370 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carbone, G.. Grasping in Robotics (Springer, London, Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, 2012).Google Scholar

Chen et al. supplementary material

Chen et al. supplementary material

Download Chen et al. supplementary material(Video)
Video 21.6 MB