No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
A FRAMEWORK FOR DESIGN COMPETENCY ASSESSMENT
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 July 2021
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
The recognition of the value of design has resulted in an increased number of programs and courses that include design and evaluate design competencies. However, there is no common reference system to (1) identify and assess the design competency of learners and the level of design competency aimed for by a course or curriculum; (2) universally recognize design competencies and competency levels.
Our research goal is to identify and define distinct levels of design competency and develop a framework to help instructors, design learners, institutes as well as employers assess and/or recognize competency. This paper introduces our DesCA (Design Competency Assessment) framework and places it in the context of other frameworks. We describe how DesCA helps: (1) identify and assess design competencies associated with different design activities planned for a course or curriculum; (2) formulate learning outcomes and select appropriate competency levels, methods and tools; (3) plan and develop the design content of courses and curricula; (4) ensure curricular consistency across courses.
The vision is to make DesCA a digital platform that can serve as an international standard for design teaching, learning and curriculum development.
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Creative Commons
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.- Copyright
- The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Albanese, M.A., Mejicano, G., Mullan, P., Kokotailo, P. and Gruppen, L. (2008), “Defining characteristics of educational competencies”, Medical Education, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Vol. 42 No. 3, pp. 248–255.Google Scholar
Bonjour, E., Micaëlli, J.-P., Hlaoittinun, O. and Deniaud, I. (2007), “Design and core competency, the missing links”, IFAC Proceedings Volumes, Elsevier BV, Vol. 40 No. 18, pp. 49–53.Google Scholar
Chan, C.K.Y., Fong, E.T.Y., Luk, L.Y.Y. and Ho, R. (2017), “A review of literature on challenges in the development and implementation of generic competencies in higher education curriculum”, International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier Ltd, Vol. 57, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
Conley, C. (2011), “The Core Competencies of Design: The Basis of a Broadly Applicable Discipline”, Idsa.Org, pp. 7–11.Google Scholar
Crawley, E.F. (2002), “Creating the CDIO syllabus, a universal template for engineering education”, 32nd Annual Frontiers in Education, Boston, MA, USA, pp. F3F–F3F.Google Scholar
Crawley, E.F., Malmqvist, J., Östlund, S. and Brodeur, D.R. (2007), Rethinking Engineering Education: The CDIO Approach, Rethinking Engineering Education: The CDIO Approach, Springer, Boston MAGoogle Scholar
Crismond, D.P. and Adams, R.S. (2012), “The informed design teaching and learning matrix”, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 101 No. 4, pp. 738–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enke, J., Kraft, K. and Metternich, J. (2015), “Competency-oriented design of learning modules”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 32, Elsevier B.V., pp. 7–12.Google Scholar
European Commission. (2008), “The Bologna Process and the European Higher Education Area | Education and Training”, available at: https://ec.europa.eu/education/policies/higher-education/bologna-process-and-european-higher-education-area_en (accessed 1 August 2020).Google Scholar
Fass, J., Rutgers, J. and Chui, M.-L. (2018), “Using Design Competencies to Define Curricula and Support Learners”, DRS2018: Catalyst, Vol. 7, available at:https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2018.578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foong, S., Subburaj, K. and Wood, K.L. (2017), “An Inductive, Design-Centric Approach to Control Engineering Education With a Competitive Atmosphere”, Proceedings of the ASME 2017 Dynamic Systems and Control Conference, DSCC2017 October 11-13, Tysons, Virginia, USA DSCC2017-5157Google Scholar
Frascara, J. (2017), “Design, and design education: How can they get together?”, Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 125–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, K. (2012), “Models of Design: Envisioning a Future Design Education”, Visibile Language, Vol. 46 No. 1(2), pp. 132–153.Google Scholar
Getha-Taylor, H., Hummert, R., Nalbandian, J. and Silvia, C. (2013), “Competency Model Design and Assessment: Findings and Future Directions”, J. of Public Affairs Education, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 141–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruppen, L.D., Burkhardt, J.C., Fitzgerald, J.T., Funnell, M., Haftel, H.M., Lypson, M.L., Mullan, P.B., et al. (2016), “Competency-based education: programme design and challenges to implementation”, Medical Education, Vol. 50 No. 5, pp. 532–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huizinga, T., Handelzalts, A., Nieveen, N., and Voogt, J.M. (2014), “Teacher involvement in curriculum design: Need for support to enhance teachers’ design expertise”, J. of Curriculum Studies, Vol. 46 (1), pp. 33–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurtubise, L. and Roman, B. (2014), “Competency-Based Curricular Design to Encourage Significant Learning”, Current Problems in Pediatric and Adolescent Health Care, Vol. 44 No. 6, pp. 164–169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnstone, S.M. and Soares, L. (2014), “Principles for Developing Competency-Based Education Programs”, Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, Vol. 46 No. 2, pp. 12–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laurillard, D. (2013), Teaching as a Design Science, Teaching as a Design Science, Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawson, B. and Dorst, K. (2013), Design Expertise, Design Expertise, Taylor and Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, M.W. and Norman, D. (2020), “Changing Design Education for the 21st Century”, She Ji, Elsevier, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 13–49.Google Scholar
MOE. (2007), Design & Technology Syllabus, available at: https://www.moe.gov.sg/docs/default-source/document/education/syllabuses/sciences/files/design-and-technology-lower-secondary-2007.pdf.Google Scholar
Norman, D. (2010), “Why Design Education Must Change”, Core 77, available at: https://www.core77.com/posts/17993/why-design-education-must-change-17993Google Scholar
Pontis, S. and van der Waarde, K. (2020), “Looking for Alternatives: Challenging Assumptions in Design Education”, She Ji, Tongji University Press, Vol. 6 No. 2, pp. 228–253.Google Scholar
Shah, J.J. (2005), “Identification, measurement & development of design skills in engineering education”, Proceedings ICED 05, the 15th International Conference on Engineering Design, Vol. DS 35, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
SkillsFuture. (2019), Skills Framework for Design - A Guide to Occupations and Skills, Singapore, available at: https://www.skillsfuture.gov.sg/.Google Scholar
Sullivan, R. and McIntosh, N. (1996), “The competency-based approach to training”, Medical Journal of Indonesia, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 95–98.Google Scholar
Telenko, C., Elara, R., Pey, L., Telenko, C., Wood, K., Otto, K., et al. (2015), “Designettes: An Approach to Multidisciplinary Engineering Design Education”, J. of Mechanical Design, Vol. 138 No. 2, p. 22001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weil, D. and Mayfield, M. (2020), “Tomorrow's critical design competencies: Building a course system for 21st century designers”, She Ji, Elsevier, Vol. 6 No. 2, pp. 157–169.Google Scholar
Yau, C. and Ong, C. (2008), “Pupils’ views towards design and technology in Singapore”, Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 37–49.Google Scholar
You have
Access
Open access