Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T18:41:02.190Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Questions of International Law Raised by the Seizure of the U.S.S. Pueblo

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

George H. Aldrich
George H. Aldrich*
Affiliation:
Department of State
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Perspectives for International Legal Development
Information
Proceedings of the American Society of International Law at its annual meeting (1921-1969) , Volume 63 , 1969 , pp. 1 - 6
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

* In this latter circumstance North Korea might, however, be able to claim a violation of the 1953 Armistice Agreement (Article 11(15)) which requires naval vessels of both sides to respect the waters contiguous to Korea, which were understood to extend twelve nautical miles to sea. However, such violation would not, by itself, give rise to any right to seize the ship.