Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-10T04:58:37.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effeminacy, camp and sexual subversion in rock: the Cure and Suede

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2008

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Middle Eight
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Mueller, Andrew. 1992. ‘Wish you were here’, Melody Maker, 2 05, pp. 42, 43Google Scholar
Mulvey, John. 1993. ‘Latter-day nitrate fever’, NME, 20 02, pp. 24–6Google Scholar
O'Neill, Vikki. 1993. ‘Family campaign protest at kiss’, The Pink Paper, 4 04Google Scholar
Price, Simon 1992. ‘Pretentious? Chamois?’, Melody Maker, 13 04Google Scholar
Raphael, Amy. 1993. ‘Twist and pout’, The Face, 03, pp. 8895Google Scholar
Rumbold, Judy. 1993. ‘Navel rating’, The Guardian, 3 04, p. 27Google Scholar
Savage, Jon. 1990. ‘Tainted love’, in Consumption, Identity and Style, ed. Tomlinson, (London)Google Scholar
Smith, Richard. 1992. ‘Ambisexuality’, Melody Maker, 12 12, p. 29Google Scholar
Smith, Richard. 1993. ‘Small town flirt’, Gay Times, 03, pp. 34–6Google Scholar
The Stud Brothers.1993. ‘Suede’, Melody Maker, 2 01Google Scholar
Sutherland, Steve. 1992. ‘The leather forecast’, Melody Maker, 25 04, p. 29Google Scholar
Thompson, and Greene, . 1988. The Cure, A Visual Documentary (London)Google Scholar