No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Antiquities in exile: Ottoman Greek refugees’ trauma and Ionian antiquities
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 April 2024
Abstract
This article contributes to our understanding of the links between forced exile, refugee trauma, and antiquities. It zooms in to the case of the Ottoman Greek refugees who fled to Greece in the wake of the collapse of the Ottoman Empire and the defeat of the Greek army by the Turkish National Movement forces in 1922. It critically discusses memories of ordinary people from Lithri (ancient Erythrai, modern-day Ildırı), Nymphaio (near ancient Sardeis, modern-day Kemalpaşa), and Ayasolouk (ancient Ephesus, modern-day Selçuk). It also looks at aspects of the literary world of Smyrna-born poet and Nobel Laureate George Seferis. It is argued that, for these refugees, antiquities served as conduits, symbols, metaphors, and allegories for expressing the trauma linked to their state of uprootedness and forced exile. The refugees in question employed reverse “rescue archaeologies,” where it was for antiquities to salvage refugees rather than the other way round. The main primary material consulted consists of refugee testimonies from the Oral Tradition Archive of the Centre for Asia Minor Studies and Seferis’s diary. The approach is interdisciplinary and, besides Ottoman Greek history, draws on cultural geography, anthropology, archaeology as well as broader discussions in memory studies and critical heritage studies.
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of New Perspectives on Turkey
References
A. E. (1977) To khronikó tou kéntrou mikrasiatikón spoudón: 1. Póte kai pós idríthike: Pós ergástike: Ta epitévgmata tou. Deltío Kéntrou Mikrasiatikón Spoudón 1, 323–329.Google Scholar
Argenti, N (2019) Introduction – the presence of the past in the era of the nation-state. In Argenti, N (ed.), Post-Ottoman Topologies – The Presence of the Past in the Era of the Nation-State. New York: Berghahn Books, 1–18.Google Scholar
Atalay, S (2006) Indigenous archaeology as decolonizing practice. American Indian Quarterly 30(3/4), 280–310.10.1353/aiq.2006.0015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baronian, M-A (2014) Archive, memory, and loss: constructing images in the Armenian diaspora. In de Cesari, C and Rigney, A (eds), Transnational Memory: Circulation, Articulation, Scales. Berlin and Boston, MA: De Gruyter, 79–97.10.1515/9783110359107.79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, E (2000) The long nineteenth century: the stakes. Presented to “Modernity’s Histories: The Long Nineteenth Century, 1789–1914”: A Conference of the University of California World History Workshop, University of California, Davis, May 19–21, 2000. Available at https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2k62f464 (accessed 23 August 2023).Google Scholar
Çelik, Z (2016) About Antiquities – Politics of Archaeology in the Ottoman Empire. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Centre for Asia Minor Studies (CAMS) (2012) Oral tradition archive. Available at http://en.kms.org.gr/Archives/OralTraditionArchive.aspx (accessed 15 October 2021).Google Scholar
Davis, C and Meretoja, H (2020) Introduction to literary trauma studies. In Davis, C and Meretoja, H (eds), The Routledge Companion to Literature and Trauma. Abingdon and New York: Routledge, 12–17.10.4324/9781351025225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Cesari, C (2016) Ottonostalgias and urban apartheid. International Journal of Islamic Architecture 5(2), 339–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deciu Ritivoi, A (2020) Affect. In Davis, C and Meretoja, H (eds), The Routledge Companion to Literature and Trauma. Abingdon and New York: Routledge, 100–107.Google Scholar
Díaz-Andreu, M (2007) A World History of Nineteenth-Century Archaeology – Nationalism, Colonialism, and the Past. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199217175.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eriksen, A (2016 [2014]) From Antiquities to Heritage – Transformations of Cultural Memory. New York: Berghahn.Google Scholar
Ganteau, J-M (2020) Working-through. In Davis, C and Meretoja, H (eds), The Routledge Companion to Literature and Trauma. Abingdon and New York: Routledge, 94–100.Google Scholar
Hamilakis, Y (2011) Indigenous archaeologies in Ottoman Greece. In Bahrani, Z, Çelik, Z and Eldem, E (eds), Scramble for the Past – A Story of Archaeology in the Ottoman Empire, 1753–1914. İstanbul: SALT, 49–69.Google Scholar
Hirsch, M (2012) The Generation of Postmemory – Writing and Visual Culture After the Holocaust. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Hirschon, R (2005) Lausanne Convention. In Gibney, MJ and Hansen, R (eds), Immigration and Asylum: From 1900 to the Present. Vol. 2. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO, 375–379.Google Scholar
Homer (1924) The Iliad with an English Translation by A.T. Murray, Ph.D. in two volumes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press and London: William Heinemann. Available at https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3atext%3a1999.01.0134 (accessed 18 May 2022).Google Scholar
Iğsız, A (2018) Humanism in Ruins – Entangled Legacies of the Greek–Turkish Population Exchange. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jerzak, K (2008) Exile as life after death in the writings of Henryk Grynberg and Norman Manea. In Rosenfeld, AH (ed.), The Writer Uprooted. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 75–91.Google Scholar
Kalpaxís, T (1990) Arkhaioloyía kai Politikí – I Samiaká Arkhaioloyiká 1850–1914. Réthimno: Panepistimiakés Ekdósis Krítis.Google Scholar
Kayalı, H (2008) The struggle for independence. In Kasaba, R (ed.), The Cambridge History of Turkey: Vol. 4, Turkey in the Modern World. New York: Cambridge University Press, 112–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, R (2014) Moving testimony: human rights, Palestinian memory, and the transnational public sphere. In de Cesari, C and Rigney, A (eds), Transnational Memory: Circulation, Articulation, Scales. Berlin and Boston, MA: De Gruyter, 51–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, R (2020) Trauma and cultural memory studies. In Davis, C and Meretoja, H (eds), The Routledge Companion to Literature and Trauma. Abingdon and New York: Routledge, 46–54.Google Scholar
Kéntro Mikrasiatikón Spoudón (2012) Arkhío prophorikís parádosis. Available at http://www.kms.org.gr/%CE%91%CF%81%CF%87%CE%B5%CE%AF%CE%B1/%CE%91%CF%81%CF%87%CE%B5%CE%AF%CE%BF%CE%A0%CF%81%CE%BF%CF%86%CE%BF%CF%81%CE%B9%CE%BA%CE%AE%CF%82%CE%A0%CE%B1%CF%81%CE%AC%CE%B4%CE%BF%CF%83%CE%B7%CF%82.aspx (accessed 15 October 2021).Google Scholar
Kurvet-Käosaar, L (2020) Trauma and life-writing. In Davis, C and Meretoja, H (eds), The Routledge Companion to Literature and Trauma. Abingdon and New York: Routledge, 202–209.Google Scholar
Lothe, J (2020) Narrative. In Davis, C and Meretoja, H (eds), The Routledge Companion to Literature and Trauma. Abingdon and New York: Routledge, 107–113.Google Scholar
Murray, T (2011) Archaeologists and indigenous people: a maturing relationship? Annual Review of Anthropology 40, 363–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumeier, E (2019) Mediating legacies of empire in the Post-Imperial Museum. History and Anthropology 30, 406–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panagópoulos, A (1993) Ta arkhaía mnimía kai i sínkhroni thlípsi (O Sephéris, i arkhaíi kai i Mikrá Asía). Parousía 9, 329–340.Google Scholar
Papatheodorou, A (2017) Ottoman policy-making in an age of reforms: unearthing Ottoman archaeology in the 19th and early 20th centuries. PhD dissertation, Faculty of Oriental Studies, University of Oxford, Oxford.Google Scholar
Petropoúlou, I (2002) Apó tous Drómous ton Tragoudión stous Drómous ton Ellínon. Kathimeriní, June 2, 2002, 3–7.Google Scholar
Rey, S (2019) Between dreams and traces – memory, temporality, and the production of sainthood in Lesbos. In Argenti, N (ed.), Post-Ottoman Topologies – The Presence of the Past in the Era of the Nation-State. New York: Berghahn Books, 104–116.Google Scholar
Rigney, A (2014) Ongoing: changing memory and the European project. In de Cesari, C and Rigney, A (eds), Transnational Memory: Circulation, Articulation, Scales. Berlin and Boston, MA: De Gruyter, 339–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rízou-Kouroupoú, M (2002) Polímokhtho Odiporikó sta Monopátia tis Mnímis. Kathimeriní, June 2, 2002, 8–13.Google Scholar
Shaw, W (2003) Possessors and Possessed, Museums, Archaeology, and the Visualization of History in the Late Ottoman Empire. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starr L (1996 [1984]) Oral history. In Dunaway, DK and Baum, WK (eds), Oral History – An Interdisciplinary Anthology. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press, 39–61.Google Scholar
Sütterlin, NA (2020) History of trauma theory. In Davis, C and Meretoja, H (eds), The Routledge Companion to Literature and Trauma. Abingdon and New York: Routledge, 19–27.Google Scholar
Thompson, P (2000 [1978] [1988]) Voice of the Past. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780192893178.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Gennep A (2016) Teletouryíes Diávasis – Sistimatikí Meléti ton Teletón. Paradéllis T (trans.). Athens: Iridanós.Google Scholar
Walton, JF (2019) Introduction: textured historicity and the ambivalence of imperial legacies. History and Anthropology 30(4), 353–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, J (2005) Through wary eyes: indigenous perspectives on archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology 34, 429–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zürcher, EJ (2007 [1993] [1994] [1997] [1998] [2001] [2004] [2005]) Turkey: A Modern History. London and New York: I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar