Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T14:35:50.545Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Innovative clusters: global or local linkages?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2020

James Simmie  and
James Sennett
James Sennett
Affiliation:
Oxford Brookes University, School of Planning, Gipsy Lane Campus, Headington, Oxford, OX3 0BP
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The idea of industrial clusters forming the basis of regional economic growth has moved rapidly from academe to policy. This research, which forms part of the ESRC Cities: Cohesion and Competitiveness Programme, suggests that greater clarity is needed in defining and applying the concept in different regions. Several different types of clusters have already been identified. The precise basis of their relative success also seems to be different according to the degree of globalisation present and the position that regions occupy in their national hierarchies. In the case of London and the South East, the research shows that the internal characteristics of firms, the ‘pick and mix’ possibilities of a large agglomeration, and its position as an international trading gatweway, are critical for successful innovation in the region.

Type
Articles
Information
National Institute Economic Review , Volume 170 , October 1999 , pp. 87 - 98
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Becattini, G. (1990), ‘The Marshallian industrial district as a socio-economic notion’, in Pyke, F., Becattini, G. and Sengenberger, W. (eds), Industrial Districts and Inter-firm Co-operation in Italy, Geneva, International Institute for Labour Statistics, pp. 37–51.Google Scholar
Butchart, R. (1987), ‘A new definition of the high-tech industries’, Economic Review, 400, pp. 82–8.Google Scholar
Camagni, R. (ed.) (1991), Innovation Networks: Spatial Perspectives, London, Belhaven-Pinter.Google Scholar
Capello, R. (1999), ‘Spatial transfer of knowledge in high technology milieux: learning versus collective learning processes’, Regional Studies, special issue: regional networking, collective learning and innovation in high technology SMEs in Europe, 33, 4, pp. 353–65.Google Scholar
Cheshire, P.C. and Gordon, I.R. (1995), ‘Change and spatial specialisation within the South East's economy’, in Cheshire, P.C. and Gordon, I.R. (eds), Territorial Competition in an Integrating Europe, Aldershot, Avebury.Google Scholar
Chinitz, B. (1961), ‘Contrasts in agglomeration: New York and Pittsburgh’, American Economic Review, 51, pp. 279–89.Google Scholar
- (1964), ‘City and suburb’, in Chinitz, B. (ed.), City and Suburb: the Economics of Metropolitan Growth, NJ, Englewood Cliffs.Google Scholar
Decoster, E. and Tabaries, M. (1986), ‘L'innovation dans un pole scientifique: le cas de la Cite Scientiflque Ile de France Sud’, in Aydalot, P. (ed.), Milieux Innovateurs en Europe, Paris, GREMI, pp. 79–100.Google Scholar
Enright, M. (1995), “Regional clusters and economic development: ‘a research agenda”, paper presented to the conference on Regional Clusters and Business Networks 1993, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada (revised version).Google Scholar
European Commission (1996), Dgs XIII and XVI RITTS and RIS Guidebook, ‘Regional Actions for Innovation’, Brussels, EC.Google Scholar
Fowler, H. W. and Fowler, F. G. (eds) (1979), The Concise Oxford Dictionary, London, Book Club Associates.Google Scholar
Gordon, I.R. (1996), ‘Territorial competition and locational advantage in the London Region’, paper presented to the American Association of Geographers annual conference, Charlotte, NC.Google Scholar
- and McCann, P. (1998), ‘Industrial clusters, agglomeration and/or social networks?’, Paper presented at the Regional Science Association British and Irish Section conference, York.Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. (1973), ‘The strength of weak ties’, American Journal of Sociology, 78, pp. 1360–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- (1985), ‘Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness’, American Journal of Sociology, 91, pp. 481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, D. and Simmie, J.M. (1997), ‘Innovation, competition and the structure of local production networks: initial findings from the Hertfordshire project’, Local Economy, November, pp. 235–46.Google Scholar
Hoover, E.M. (1937), Location Theory and the Shoe and Leather Industries, Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoover, E.M. (1948), The Location of Economic Activity, McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Isard, W. (1951), ‘Location theory and trade theory: distance inputs and the space economy’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 65, pp. 181–98.Google Scholar
Keeble, D., Lawson, C., Moore, B. and Wilkinson, F. (1999), ‘Collective learning processes, networking and ‘institutional thickness' in the Cambridge Region’, Regional Studies, special issue: regional networking, collective learning and innovation in high technology SMEs in Europe, 33, 4, pp. 319–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keeble, D. and Wilkinson, F. (1999), ‘Collective learning and knowledge development in the evolution of regional clusters of high technology SMEs in Europe’, Regional Studies, special issue: regional networking, collective learning and innovation in high technology SMEs in Europe, 33, 4, pp. 295–303.Google Scholar
Manshanden, W. (1999), ‘Business services and regional economic development: the economics of proximity’, English PhD summary, Amsterdam, Foundation of Economic Research of the University of AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
Malmberg, A. (1997), ‘Industrial geography: location and learning’, Progress in Human Geography, 21, 4, pp. 573–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markusen, A. (1996), ‘Sticky places in slippery space: a typology of industrial districts’, Economic Geography, 72, pp. 293–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, A. (1919), Industry and Trade, London, Macmillan.Google Scholar
- (1925), Principles of Economics, London, Macmillan.Google Scholar
McCann, P. (1995), ‘Rethinking the economics of location and agglomeration’, Urban Studies, 32,3, pp, 563–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maskell, P. and Malmberg, A. (1999), ‘Localised learning and industrial competitiveness’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 23, pp. 293–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, E.S. (1980), Urban Economics, Glenview Illinois, Scott, Forseman and Co.Google Scholar
Nooteboom, B. (1992), ‘Towards a dynamic theory of transactions’, Journal of Evolutionary Economy, 2, pp. 281–99.Google Scholar
- (1996), ‘Innoveren, globaliseren’, Econ. Stat. Ber, 9 October, pp. 828–30.Google Scholar
Oakey, R. (1985), ‘High technology industries and agglomeration economies’, in Hall, P. and Markusen, A. (eds), Silicon Landscapes, Boston, Allen and Unwin, pp. 94–117.Google Scholar
Oerlemanns, L.A.G. (1996), De Ingebedde Onderneming: Innoveren in Industriele Netwerken, Tilburg, Tilburg University Press.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and the Statistical Office of the European Communities (1997), Propsed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data, Oslo Manual, Paris, OECD.Google Scholar
Perrin, J. (1988), Comment Naissent les Techniques? Paris, Publisud.Google Scholar
Perroux, F. (1950), ‘Economic space: theory and applications’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 64, pp. 89–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piore, M.J. and Sabel, C.F. (1984), The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity, Basic Books.Google Scholar
Popp, K. (1987), ‘Standortfaktoren und standorte der mikroelectronischen industrie’, Geographie und Schule, 49, pp. 2–8.Google Scholar
Porter, M.E. (1990), The Competitive Advantage of Nations, The Free Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabellotti, R. (1995), ‘Is there an ‘industrial district model’? Footwear districts in Italy and Mexico compared’, World Development, 23(1), pp, 29–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sainsbury (Lord) (1999), ‘Biotechnology clusters: report of a team led by Lord Sainsbury, Minister for Science’, London, Department of Trade and Industry.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J.A. (1939), Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Hisorical and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process, New York, McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Simmie, J. M. (ed.) (1996), Innovation, Networks and Learning Regions?, London, Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
- (1998a), ‘Innovate or stagnate: economic planning choices for local production nodes in the global economy’, Planning Practice and Research, 13, 1, pp. 35–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- (1998b), ‘Reasons for the development of “Islands of innovation”. Evidence from Hertfordshire’, Urban Studies, 35, 8, pp. 1261–89.Google Scholar
- and Hart, D. (1999), ‘Innovation projects and local production networks: a case study of Hertfordshire’, European Planning Studies, 7, 4, pp. 445–62.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. (1996), ‘Reasons for the genesis of high-tech regions - theoretical explanation and empirical evidence’, Geoforum, 27, 2, pp. 205–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaessen, P.M.M. (1993), ‘Small business growth in contrasting environments’, Netherlands Geographical Studies, 165, Royal Dutch Geographical Society, Utrecht.Google Scholar
- and Keeble, D. (1995), ‘Growth-oriented SMEs in unfavourable regional environments’, Regional Studies, 29, pp. 489–505.Google Scholar
- and Wever, E. (1993), ‘Spatial responsiveness of small firms’, Tijdschr. Econ. Soc. Geogr., 84, pp. 119–131.Google Scholar
Veltz, P. (1993), ‘L'economie des villes, entre la montee du global et le retour du local’, Territoires et Societes (mimeo).Google Scholar
Vernon, R. (1966), ‘International investment and international trade in the product cycle’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80, pp. 190–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- (1979), ‘The product cycle hypothesis in a new international environment’, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 41, pp. 255–67.Google Scholar
Weber, A. (1909), Theory of the Location of Industries, translated by C. J. Friedrich 1929, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar