Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T10:30:34.540Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ultrasonic NDE for Surface Roughness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2013

D.G. Eitzen  and
G.V. Blessing
Get access

Extract

In a number of materials processes, on-line monitoring of surface finish is important to control material quality or process integrity. In rolling some sheet steel into coils, the rollers are intentionally roughened so that a specified roughness range is transferred to the sheet. Then the end product sheet can be optimally spray painted. The rollers, however, eventually wear smooth. Currently, pieces of sheet are sampled by hand and if a piece is too smooth, the coils produced since the last good sample are problematical. In automated machining it is useful to know during the cutting process whether the part will have the required surface finish. More importantly, for a large class of automated machining applications, a dull tool can be defined as one which produces a rougher part surface.

Monitoring the finish of the newly cut surface could allow a decision to be made about changing the tool. For untended machining this could provide a strategy for tool management. The strategy would be much more efficient than the alternative of changing a tool after X hours when it might have lasted 10X hours were it in the upper 10% of the life curve.

To fulfill the need for noncontact surface finish measurement, optical scattering devices have been developed to provide a surface interrogation technique. However, this technique is significantly limited for many applications because the optical beam must interact with a dry surface. This makes its application very difficult in the harsh wet environment encountered in automated machining and in some metal sheet production.

Type
On-Line Nondestructive Evaluation
Information
MRS Bulletin , Volume 13 , Issue 4 , April 1988 , pp. 49 - 52
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Teague, E.C., Vorburger, T.V., and Maystre, D., Annals of the CIRP 30 (1981) p. 563–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Vorburger, T.V. and Teague, E.C., Precision Engineering 3 (1981) p. 61–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Thwaite, E.G., Precision Engineering 6 (4) (1984) p. 207–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Blessing, G.V. and Eitzen, D.G., Patent applied for (1987).Google Scholar
5.Stearns, R.G. and Kino, G.S., IEEE Trans. UFFC-34 (1987) p. 179–190.Google Scholar
6.Haines, N.F. and Langston, D.B., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 67 (5) (1980) p. 1443–1454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Neubauer, W.G., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 35 (3) (1963) p. 279–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Beckmann, P. and Spizzichino, A., The Scattering of Electromagnetic Waves from Rough Surfaces (Pergamon, New York, 1963).Google Scholar
9.deBilly, M., Cohen-Tenoudji, F., Quentin, G., Lewis, K., and Adler, L., Proceedings of the DARPA/AF-WAL Review of Progress in Quantitative NDE, AFWAL-TR-81-4080 (1980) p. 320–329.Google Scholar
10.Blessing, G.V., Bagley, P.P., and James, J.E., Mater. Eval. 42 (1984) p. 1389–1400.Google Scholar
11.Blessing, G.V. and Eitzen, D.G., Proc. of Metrology and Properties of Engineering Surfaces (to be published, 1988).Google Scholar
12.Vorburger, T.V. (private communication of sample and data).Google Scholar