Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T10:46:06.435Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Advanced Processing of Composites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2013

Get access

Extract

The preservation of U.S. aeronautical leadership is an economic and military necessity, but it is by no means assured. The rise of Airbus, Ariane, and Embraer has been lightning fast; tomorrow could see the development of Japan's FSC or Israel's Lavi. Our competitors are well organized and often enjoy the support of their governments. Our capabilities are no longer unique; thus our future work is clearly defined for us.

The key to continued U.S. preeminence in aerospace is to be found in the further research, development, and application of a group of revolutionary technologies in the areas of propulsion, numerical and symbolic computation, laminar flow modeling, and advanced materials and structures. Exploitation of the emerging technologies in these areas by industry, government, and universities will significantly impact the performance and cost of future aerospace vehicles and systems. Materials science and engineering, particularly the discipline of nondestructive evaluation, will play a major role in making such continued aerospace leadership a reality.

From the use of plastic and glass radomes in the first jet engine demonstrators to the composite parts of today's most advanced aircraft, the need to ensure reliable materials has always been critical. Advanced materials and structural concepts offer the opportunity for significant airframe improvements on all types of aircraft. Indeed tomorrow's aerospace structures, such as the National Aerospace Plane, the Space Station, as well as the ATF and SDI-related items will employ a myriad of exotic materials that must be extremely reliable and highly producible.

Type
On-Line Nondestructive Evaluation
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. This “Introduction” contains remarks delivered by Dr. Peter Canon, vice president-research and chief scientist, Rockwell International Corporation, at the Spring Conference of the American Society of Nondestructive Testing, April 9, 1987.Google Scholar
2.Tittmann, B.R., “NDE at Twelve O'Clock High,” J. Mechanical Eng. 109 (9) (1987) p. 7274.Google Scholar
3.Lee, W.I., Loos, A.C., and Springer, G.S., “Curing of Epoxy Matrix Composites,” J. Comp. Mater. 16 (1982) p. 510.Google Scholar
4.Tittmann, B.R., Pardee, W.J., Cohen-Tenoudji, F., and Bujard, M., “An Approach to Automated Curing of Gr/Epoxy Composites,” Proceedings of 1986 International Congress on Technology and Technology Exchange (ICTTE '86), Pittsburgh, PA, (1986) p. 1317.Google Scholar
5.Sorer, G.A. and Hauser, E.A., J. Polym. Sci. 8 (1952) p. 6.Google Scholar
6.Winfree, W.P. and Parker, F.R., “Ultrasonic Characterization of Changes in Viscoelastic Properties of Epoxy During Cure,” Review of Progress in QNDE, edited by Thompson, D.O. and Chimenti, D. (Plenum Press, New York, 4B, 1985) p. 12031208.Google Scholar
7.Bujard, M., Tittmann, B.R., Ahlberg, L.A., and Cohen-Tenoudji, F., “Dynamic Viscosity Measurements of Fluids Employing Resonance Characteristics of a Piezoelectric Element Vibrating in the Shear-Mode,” Review of Progress in QNDE, edited by Thompson, D.O. and Chimenti, D.E. (Plenum Press, New York, 6B, 1987) p. 12671276.Google Scholar
8.Harrold, R.T. and Sanjana, Z.N., “Nondestructive Evaluation of the Curing of Resin and Prepreg Using an Acoustic Waveguide Sensor.” Review of Progress in QNDE, edited by Thompson, D.O. and Chimenti, D.E. (Plenum Press, New York, 6B, 1987) p. 12771285.Google Scholar
9.Fanconi, B., Wang, F., and Lowry, R., “Process Monitoring of Polymer Matrix Composites Using Fluorescence Probes,” Review of Progress in QNDE, edited by Thompson, D.O. and Chimenti, D.E. (Plenum Press, New York, 6B, 1987) p. 12871295.Google Scholar
10.Kranbuehl, D.E., Delos, S.E., Hoff, M.S., Whitham, M.E., Weller, L.W., and Haventy, P.D., “Dynamic Dielectric Analysis for Nondestructive Cure Monitoring and Process Control,” Review of Progress in QNDE, edited by Thompson, D.O. and Chimenti, D.E. (Plenum Press, New York, 6B, 1987) p. 12971306.Google Scholar
11.Kranbuehl, D.E., Delos, S.E., and Yue, P.K., Polymer 27 (11) (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Harrold, R.T. and Sanjana, Z.N., J. Polym. Sci. 26 (5) (1986).Google Scholar
13.Harrison, G. and Barlow, A.J., “Dynamic Viscosity Measurements, Ch. 3 in Methods of Experimental Physics, Vol. 19 (Academic Press, 1981) p. 137178.Google Scholar
14.Loos, A.C. and Springer, G.S., J. Comp. Mater. 17 (1983) p. 135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Kaelble, D.H., CAD/CAM Handbook for Polymer Composite Reliability, Final Report for the period Nov. 1, 1980 to Nov. 1, 1982, p. 91, U.S. Army Research Office, Contract No. DAAG-29-80-C-0137, March 1983.Google Scholar
16.Springer, G.S., J. Comp. Mater. 16 (1982) p. 400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Pardee, W.J. (private communication).Google Scholar