Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-11T09:35:55.222Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evidence for the co-existence of separate strains or species of Ligula in Lough Neagh, Northern Ireland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2024

P.D. Olson
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD, UK:
D.T.J. Littlewood
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD, UK:
D. Griffiths
Affiliation:
School of Environmental Studies, University of Ulster at Coleraine, Co. Londonderry, BT52 1SA, UK:
C.R. Kennedy
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, EX4 4PS, UK:
C. Arme*
Affiliation:
Parasitology Research Laboratory, School of Life Sciences, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK
*
*Author for correspondence Fax: 01782 583516 E-mail: c.arme@biol.keele.ac.uk

Abstract

Ligula (Cestoda: Pseudophyllidea) infections in gudgeon (Gobio gobio) and roach (Rutilus rutilus) differ markedly in the pathology that is observed in the host, particularly with respect to a tissue response and the extent of inhibition of gonadal development. The entire internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region (ITS-1, 5.8S and ITS-2) and the large subunit domains D1–D3 were sequenced and compared in parasites from these fish from Lough Neagh, Northern Ireland, together with a single specimen from minnow (Phoxinus phoxinus) from Wales. Sufficient differences were observed between parasites from R. rutilus and G. gobio to support the suggestion that they may represent different strains/species. In contrast, Ligula from P. phoxinus closely resembled those from R. rutilus. Ligula infections in G. gobio were recorded prior to the introduction of R. rutilus. The co-existence of separate strains or species of Ligula in Lough Neagh probably resulted from the introduction of R. rutilus to these waters, correlated with an increase in the number of great crested grebes (Podiceps cristatus).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arme, C. (1975) Tapeworm–host interactions. pp. 505532 in Jennings, D. & Lee, D.L. (Eds) Symposium of the Society for Experimental Biology No. 29–Symbiosis. Cambridge, The University Press.Google Scholar
Arme, C. (1997) Ligulosis in two cyprinid hosts: Rutilus rutilus and Gobio gobio . Helminthologia 34, 191196.Google Scholar
Bean, C.W. & Winfield, I.J. (1989) Biological and ecological effects of a Ligula intestinalis (L.) infestation of the gudgeon, Gobio gobio (L.), in Lough Neagh, Northern Ireland. Journal of Fish Biology 34, 135147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bean, C.W. & Winfield, I.J. (1992) Effects of the tapeworm Ligula intestinalis (L.) on the spatial distributions of juvenile roach Rutilus rutilus (L.) and gudgeon Gobio gobio (L.) in Lough Neagh, Northern Ireland. Netherlands Journal of Zoology 42, 416429.Google Scholar
Cragg-Hine, D. (1973) Coarse fish and fishery management in Northern Ireland. Proceedings of the 6th British Coarse Fish Conference, University of Liverpool, 5259.Google Scholar
Dubinina, M.N. (1980) Tapeworms (Cestoda, Ligulidae) of the fauna of the USSR. New Delhi, Amerind Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Holland, C.V. & Kennedy, C.R. (1997) A checklist of parasitic helminth and crustacean species recorded in freshwater fish from Ireland. Biology and Environment: Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy 97B, 225243.Google Scholar
Kennedy, C.R., Shears, P.C. & Shears, J.A. (2001) Long-term dynamics of Ligula intestinalis and roach Rutilus rutilus: a study of three epizootic cycles over thirty one years. Parasitology 123, 257269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kennedy, C.R. & Burrough, R.J. (1981) The establishment and subsequent history of a population of Ligula intestinalis in roach, Rutilus rutilus (L.). Journal of Fish Biology 19, 105126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, M. & Fitzmaurice, P. (1968) The biology of the bream Abramis brama (L.) in Irish waters. Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy 67B, 95157.Google Scholar
Kennedy, M. & Fitzmaurice, P. (1972) Some aspects of the biology of gudgeon Gobio gobio (L.) in Irish waters. Journal of Fish Biology 4, 425440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Littlewood, D.T.J., Curini-Galletti, M. & Herniou, E.A. (2000) The interrelationships of Proseriata (Platyhelminthes: Seriata) flatworms tested with molecules and morphology. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 16, 449466.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maddison, D.R. & Maddison, W.P. (2000) MacClade 4: analysis of phylogeny and character evolution, version beta 4.0b28. Sunderland, Massachusetts, Sinauer Associates, Inc. Google Scholar
McManus, D.P. (1985) Enzyme analysis of natural populations of Schistocephalus solidus and Ligula intestinalis . Journal of Helminthology 59, 323332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, P.D., Littlewood, D.T.J., Bray, R.A. & Mariaux, J. (2001) Interrelationships and evolution of the tapeworms (Platyhelminthes: Cestoda). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 18, 443467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orr, T.S.C. (1967) Distribution of the plerocercoid of Ligula intestinalis . Journal of the Zoological Society of London 153, 9197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, R.C.A. & Lymbery, A.J. (1988) The nature, extent and significance of variation within the genus Echinococcus . Advances in Parasitology 27, 209259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, R.C.A., Lymberry, A.J. & Constantine, C.C. (1995) Variation in Echinococcus–towards a taxonomic revision of the genus. Advances in Parasitology 35, 145176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tobin, C. (1986) A record of Ligula intestinalis (L.) (Cestoda) from roach (Rutilus rutilus (L.)) in Lough Neagh. Irish Naturalists Journal 22, 78.Google Scholar
Winfield, I.J., Winfield, D.K. & Tobin, C.M. (1992) Interactions between the roach, Rutilus rutilus, and waterfowl populations of Lough Neagh, Northern Ireland. Environmental Biology of Fishes 33, 207214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar