No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Regulating surrogacy intermediaries: a comparative analysis of regulatory approaches and implications in the Chinese context
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 May 2024
Abstract
This article addresses the significant research gap concerning the regulation of surrogacy intermediaries in China’s rapidly growing surrogacy market. Employing a ‘law in context’ perspective, it explores the question of how to effectively regulate surrogacy intermediaries in the Chinese context. Situated within China’s unique socio-cultural landscape, where procreation carries profound significance, the study navigates the complexities of surrogacy regulation, including ethical dilemmas, rights infringements and regulatory ambiguities. The article advocates for the regulation of surrogacy in China to prevent possible exploitation, referencing three international models: prohibiting commercial surrogacy, governing non-profit surrogacy organisations and imposing duties on for-profit surrogacy agents. The aim is to construct a robust, context-sensitive regulatory framework for surrogacy in China, focusing on identifying suitable intermediaries and defining the scope of effective regulatory oversight.
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Alpermann, B and Zhan, S (2019) Population Planning After the One-Child Policy: Shifting Modes of Political Steering in China. Journal of Contemporary China 28(117), 348–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, LS (2013) Legislative Oppression: Restricting Gestational Surrogacy to Married Couples Is an Attempt to Legislate Morality. University of Baltimore Law Review 42(4), Article 2. Available at: http://scholarworks.law.ubalt.edu/ublr/vol42/iss4/2.Google Scholar
Atapattu, S, Klug, H and Sharafi, M (2023) ‘Law in context’ in post-colonial South Asia. International Journal of Law in Context, 1–3.Google Scholar
Attawet, J (2022) Reconsidering surrogacy legislation in Thailand. Medico-Legal Journal 90(1), 45–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bhattacharyya, R (2016) Draft Surrogacy (Regulation) Bill 2016: rhetoric or surrogate-centric? Space and Culture, India 4, 9–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blauwhoff, R and Frohn, L (2016
) International Commercial Surrogacy Arrangements: The Interests of the Child as a Concern of Both Human Rights and Private International Law. In Paulussen, C, Takacs, T, Lazić, V and Van Rompuy, B (eds), Fundamental Rights in International and European Law: Public and Private Law Perspective
s. Springer, pp. 211–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabeza, R et al., (2018) Surrogacy: Law, Practice and Policy in England and Wales. LexisNexis.Google Scholar
Cao, H and Zhang, X (2022) Fighting in the shadow of heteropatriarchy: feminists versus gay men’s discursive battle over surrogacy in China. Feminist Media Studies. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2022.2129415.Google Scholar
Carbone, J and Madeira, JL (2015) The Role of Agency: Compensated Surrogacy and the Institutionalization of Assisted Reproduction Practices. Wash. L. Rev. Online, 90, 7.Google Scholar
Center for Reproductive Rights (2023) Assisted Reproduction and Surrogacy in India. Available at: https://reproductiverights.org/assisted-reproduction-and-surrogacy-in-india/.Google Scholar
CGTN (2021) Surrogacy stirs up heated debate in China. Available at: https://news.cgtn.com/news/2021-02-11/Surrogacy-stirs-up-heated-debate-in-China-XN6xheD60w/index.html.Google Scholar
Chen, S (2017) Surrogatehood becomes a family industry in poor Chinese villages. South China Morning Post. Available at: https://www.scmp.com/news/china/society/article/2126286/surrogate-motherhood-becomes-family-industry-poor-chinese.Google Scholar
Chunyan, D (2022) Who are my parents? Determining parenthood of surrogate children under Chinese law. Asia Pacific Law Review 30(1), 123–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creutzfeldt, N, Kubal, A and Pirie, F (2016) Introduction: Exploring the comparative in socio-legal studies. International Journal of Law in Context 12(4), 377–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crockin, SL, Edmonds, MA and Altman, A (2020) Legal principles and essential surrogacy cases every practitioner should know. Fertility and Sterility 113(5), 908–915.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Damelio, J and Sorensen, K (2008) Enhancing autonomy in paid surrogacy. Bioethics 22(5), 269–277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Darling, MJT (2020) New York State Creates New Governance of Commercial Gestational Surrogacy. The New Bioethics, 26(4), 328–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/20502877.2020.1835204
CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, JS (2017) Regulating Surrogacy Agencies through Value-Based Compliance. J. Corp. L. 43, 663.Google Scholar
Deomampo, D (2013) Transnational surrogacy in India: interrogating power and women’s agency. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies 34(3), 184.Google Scholar
Ding, C (2015) Surrogacy litigation in China and beyond. Journal of Law and the Biosciences 2(1), 33–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egan, S (2017) The Doctrinal Approach in International Human Rights Scholarship. UCD Working Papers in Law, Criminology & Socio-Legal Studies Research Paper No. 19/17. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3082194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Federal Bureau of Investigation (2012) Prominent surrogacy attorney sentenced to prison for her role in baby-selling case. Available at: https://archives.fbi.gov/archives/sandiego/press-releases/2012/prominent-surrogacy-attorney-sentenced-to-prison-for-her-role-in-baby-selling-case.Google Scholar
Fronek, P (2020) Current Perspectives on the Ethics of Selling International Surrogacy Support Services. Medicolegal and Bioethics 8, 20.Google Scholar
Gola, S (2021). One step forward or one step back? Autonomy, agency and surrogates in the Indian Surrogacy (Regulation) Bill 2019. International Journal of Law in Context 17(1), 58–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gola, S (2021) One step forward or one step back? Autonomy, agency and surrogates in the Indian Surrogacy (Regulation) Bill 2019. International Journal of Law in Context 17(1), 58–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graziadei, M (2006) Comparative Law as the Study of Transplants and Receptions. In Reimann, M. and Zimmermann, R. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Han, T (2023) A desirable future or unaffordable hope? Queer people becoming parents through assisted reproductive technology (ART) in Guangdong, China. Culture, Health & Sexuality 25(4), 413–427.Google Scholar
Handwerker, L (2002) The Politics of Making Modern Babies in China in Infertility around the Globe: New Thinking on Childlessness, Gender, and Reproductive Technologies. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 298–315.Google Scholar
Hibino, Y (2022) Ongoing Commercialization of Gestational Surrogacy due to Globalization of the Reproductive Market before and after the Pandemic. Asian Bioethics Review 14(4), 349–361.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horsey, K (2023) The future of surrogacy: a review of current global trends and national landscapes. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 103764.Google ScholarPubMed
Horsey, K and Sheldon, S (2012) Still hazy after all these years: The law regulating surrogacy. Medical Law Review 20(1), 67–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacobson, H (2016) Labor of Love: Gestational Surrogacy and the Work of Making Babies. Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Kashyap, S and Tripathi, P (2023) The Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021: A Critique. Asian Bioethics Review 15, 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41649-022-00222-5
CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laufer-Ukeles, P (2013) Mothering for money: Regulating commercial intimacy. Indiana Law Journal 88(1), 1–57.Google Scholar
Laufer-Ukeles, P (2013) Mothering for Money: Regulating Commercial Intimacy. Indiana Law Journal 88(4), 1223–1260.Google Scholar
Lindheim, SR et al. (2014) The impact of assisted reproduction on socio-cultural values and social norms. Advances in Anthropology 4(4), 227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, R (2015) Renkou Jisheng Fa Xiugai; Weiyuan Jianyi Nadiao ‘Jinzhi Daiyun’ Tiao (Amending of the Population and Family Planning Law: Committee Members Propose to Delete the Provision on Banning Surrogacy). Available at http://npc.people.com.cn/n1/2015/1223/c14576-27967873.html.Google Scholar
Liu, Y, Xian, X and Du, L (2022) Perspectives on Surrogacy in Chinese Social Media: A Content Analysis of Microblogs on Weibo. Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine 95(3), 305–316.Google ScholarPubMed
Lung, FW, Shu, BC, Chiang, TL and Lin, SJ (2021) Recalled Parental Gender Preference in Chinese Culture: A Taiwan Birth Cohort Study. Available at: ∼https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33594530/#:∼:text=Over%20half%20of%20the%20parents,%25%2C%20fathers%3A%2019.9%25).Google Scholar
Luo, Y (2023) Unraveling Informality and Precarity: New Labor Law Strategies for the Global Reproduction Network of Cross-Border Surrogacy. Asian Bioethics Review, 1–19.Google ScholarPubMed
Luo, Y, Marshall, S and Cuthbert, D (2022) The human rights implications of not-for-profit surrogacy organizations in cross-border commercial surrogacy: An Australian case study. Business and Human Rights Journal 7(1), 163–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millbank, J (2015) Rethinking ‘Commercial’ Surrogacy in Australia. UTSLRS 8(12) Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 477.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nicolas, P (2014) Straddling the Columbia: A constitutional law professor’s musings on circumventing Washington State’s criminal prohibition on compensated surrogacy. Washington Law Review 89, 1235–1287.Google Scholar
Nuffield Council on Bioethics (2023) Surrogacy law reforms: Timid tinkering or nothing short of revolutionary. Nuffield Bioethics. Available at: https://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/blog/surrogacy-law-reforms-timid-tinkering-or-nothing-short-of-revolutionary.Google Scholar
Pande, A (2014) Wombs in Labour: Transnational compensated surrogacy in India. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radin, MJ (1994) What, if Anything, Is Wrong with Baby Selling? Pace Law Journal 26, 135.Google Scholar
Raposo, V and Wai, U (2016) Surrogacy in Greater China: The Legal Framework in Taiwan, Hong Kong, Macao, and Mainland China. UCLA Pac. Basin LJ 34, 135.Google Scholar
Report of the Committee of Inquiry into Human Fertilisation and Embryology (Report Cmnd 9314, 1984) para 8.17.Google Scholar
Rudrappa, S (2018) Reproducing dystopia: The politics of transnational surrogacy in India, 2002–2015. Critical Sociology 44(7–8), 1087–1101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudrappa, S and Collins, C (2015) Altruistic agencies and compassionate consumers: Moral framing of transnational surrogacy. Gender & Society 29(6), 937–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schover, RL (2014) Cross-border surrogacy: The case of Baby Gammy highlights the need for global agreement on protections for all parties. Fertility and Sterility, 102(5), 1258–1259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shanyun, X (2022) Uterus rental: Regulating surrogacy in China. Medico-Legal Journal 90(1), 41–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smietana, M, Rudrappa, S and Weis, C (2021) Moral frameworks of commercial surrogacy within the US, India, and Russia. Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters 29(1), 377–393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smietana, M, Thompson, C and Twine, FW (2018) Making and breaking families–reading queer reproductions, stratified reproduction and reproductive justice together. Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online 7, 112. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/90977/1/Smietana_Introduction-making-and-breaking.pdf
CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smolin, D (2016) Surrogacy as the sale of children: applying lessons learned from adoption to the regulation of the surrogacy industry’s global marketing of children. Pepperdine Law Review 243(2), 265.Google Scholar
Spar, D L (2006) The Baby Business: How Money, Science and Politics Drive the Commerce of Conception. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.Google Scholar
Storrow, R (2015) Surrogacy: American Style. In Gerber, P and O’Byrne, K (eds), Surrogacy, Law and Human Rights. Routlege, pp. 193–216.Google Scholar
Tang, Q (2019) Surrogacy in China: Public Opinion, Litigations, and Court Rulings. Asian Social Science 15(10), 84–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang, WK (2021) Revealing of surrogacy market: 850000 yuan for gender selection, extra 100000 yuan for twins of mixed sex. Available at: https://finance.sina.com.cn/tech/2021-01-18/doc-ikftssan8001564.shtml.Google Scholar
Thompson, K (2016) Whoa, Baby! Why American Surrogates Are in Demand for Chinese Families. Hollywood Reporter, 4 November. Available at: https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/features/whoa-baby-why-american-surrogates-are-demand-chinese-families-942832.Google Scholar
UK Fertilisation and Embryology Bill. Available at: https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200708/ldbills/006/en/08006x-d.htm
Google Scholar
UK Law Commissions (2023) Building families through surrogacy: a new law. Summary of report. Available at: https://s3-eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/cloud-platform-e218f50a4812967ba1215eaecede923f/uploads/sites/30/2023/03/LC_Surrogacy_Summary_of_Report_2023.pdf.Google Scholar
Ventrelli, AM et al. (2016) Report to the House of Delegates on the Model Act Governing Assisted Reproductive Technology Agencies. A.B.A. Section of Family Law Report 112A.Google Scholar
Wang, S (2017) Revealing the kingdom of underground surrogacy industry. Available at: https://www.jiemian.com/article/1116083.html.Google Scholar
Weis, C (2021) Changing fertility landscapes: exploring the reproductive routes and choices of fertility patients from China for assisted reproduction in Russia. Asian Bioethics Review 13(1), 7–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whittaker, A (2016) From ‘Mung Ming’ to ‘Baby Gammy’: A local history of assisted reproduction in Thailand. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 2, 71–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whytock, CA (2009) Legal origins, functionalism, and the future of comparative law. BYU L. Rev., 1879.Google Scholar
Xiao, Y, Li, J and Zhu, L (2020) Surrogacy in China: A Dilemma Between Public Policy and the Best Interests of Children. International Journal of Law, Policy and The Family 34, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yan, A (2017) Why China keeps surrogacy a grey area. South China Morning Post. Available at: https://www.scmp.com/news/china/society/article/2083072/why-china-keeps-surrogacy-grey-area.Google Scholar
Yang, C (2023) China’s Surrogacy Debate Extends to Women’s Toilets. Sixth Tone, 15 May. Available at: https://www.sixthtone.com/news/1012902.Google Scholar
Yang, J (2014) Informal surrogacy in China: Embodiment and biopower. Body & Society 21(1), 90–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zervogianni, E (2019) Lessons Drawn from the Regulation of Surrogacy in Greece, Cyprus, and Portugal, or a Plea for the Regulation of Commercial Gestational Surrogacy. International Journal of Law, Policy, and the Family 33(2), 160–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, L (2015) CCTV exposes illegal surrogate agencies: surrogates are forced to abort when pregnant with female baby. Available at: https://society.huanqiu.com/article/9CaKrnJGTkx.Google Scholar
Zhao, Y (2023) Protection of rights and legal remedies for surrogates in China. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 10(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar