Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-09T22:02:28.658Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Contextualising the absence of standardised approaches to transitional justice in the Philippines

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2024

Tine Destrooper Open the ORCID record for Tine Destrooper [Opens in a new window]
Tine Destrooper*
Affiliation:
Justice Visions, Human Rights Centre, Faculty of Law and Criminology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
*
Email: tine.destrooper@ugent.be
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The professionalisation, institutionalisation and standardisation of transitional justice has often been critiqued for pushing more informal, vernacular or experimental approaches off the radar. While this concern is legitimate and needs to be addressed, this article explores the continued relevance of standardised approaches, and of a shared language of transitional justice more specifically. I develop this argument against the background of recent events in the Philippines where, in May 2022, Ferdinand Marcos Jr., son of the former dictator, won the presidential elections. In this article I show that there has been a multiplicity of context-sensitive, vernacular and experimental transitional justice initiatives to deal with intersecting and multilayered legacies of violence, but that what has been missing is an overarching framework as expressed through the discourse of transitional justice, and the potential to forge collaborations and coalitions on the basis thereof. The case of the Philippines hints at the potential of a more ecological understanding of transitional justice in which justice actors involved in standardised and vernacular, formal and informal, state and non-state, top-down and bottom-up approaches recognise each other and certain shared objectives through the shared language and normativity of transitional justice.

Keywords

transitional justicestandardisationcontextualisationaccountabilityinnovationstate-centric approaches
Type
Article
Information
International Journal of Law in Context , First View , pp. 1 - 17
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akmaliah, W (2012) Remembering the Legacies of the Marcos Dictatorship: The Formation of Historical Memory and the Struggle for Justice in the Post-Marcos Period. Engage! Public Intellectuals Transforming Society, 24 November. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/8146356/Remembering_the_Legacies_of_the_Marcos_Dictatorship_The_Formation_of_Historical_Memory_and_the_Struggle_for_Justice_in_the_Post_Marcos_Period.Google Scholar
Bell, C, Campbell, C and Ni Aolain, F (2007) Transitional justice: (re)conceptualising the field. International Journal of Law in Context 3(2), 81–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breslin, A (2017) Art and transitional justice: The ‘infinite incompleteness’ of transition. In Lawther, C, Moffett, L and Jacobs, D (eds), Research Handbook on Transitional Justice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 267–285.Google Scholar
Carranza, R (2008) Plunder and pain. Should transitional justice engage with corruption and economic crimes? International Journal of Transitional Justice 17(3), 310–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Celoza, AF (1998) Ferdinand Marcos and the Philippines: The Political Economy of Authoritarianism. Singapore: Toppan.Google Scholar
Claudio, LE (2010) Memories of the Anti-Marcos Movement: The Left and the Mnemonic Dynamics of the Post-Authoritarian Philippines. South East Asia Research 18(1), 33–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, C (2010) Post-transitional Justice: Human Rights Trials in Chile and El Salvador. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Corpuz-Uminga, M (2015) Transitional Justice and Teaching Youth about the Martial Law Era in Philippines. Political Crossroads 22(1), 43–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cruz, RD (2022) Planned memorial museum for martial law victims faces funding problems, ABS-CBN News, 15 September. Available at: https://news.abs-cbn.com/news/09/15/22/planned-memorial-museum-for-martial-law-victims-faces-funding-problems.Google Scholar
Davidson, NR (2017) Alien Tort Statute Litigation and Transitional Justice: Bringing the Marcos Case back to the Philippines. International Journal of Transitional Justice 11(2), 257–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Greiff, P (2012) Theorizing Transitional Justice. Nomos 51, 33–77.Google Scholar
Destrooper, T, Carlson, KB and Gissel, LE (2023) Introduction: Moving beyond binary thinking. In Destrooper, T, Gissel, LE and Carlson, KB (eds), Innovation and Consolidation in Transitional Justice. Learning from Aparadigmatic Contexts. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ela, N (2017) Litigation Dilemmas: Lessons from the Marcos Human Rights Class Action. Law & Social Inquiry 42(2), 479–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evrard, E, Mejía Bonifazi, G and Destrooper, T (2021) The Meaning of Participation in Transitional Justice: A Conceptual Proposal for Empirical Analysis. International Journal of Transitional Justice 15(2), 428–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Firchow, P and Selim, Y (2022) Meaningful Engagement from the Bottom-Up? Taking Stock of Participation in Transitional Justice Processes. International Journal of Transitional Justice 16(2), 187–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia, RFB (2017) To Suffer Thy Comrades. How the Revolution Decimated Its Own. Manila: Anvil Publishing, 3 rd edn.Google Scholar
Garcia, RFB (2021) Disrupting cycles of discontent. Transitional justice and prevention in the Philippines. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice.Google Scholar
Giles, H (2019) Toward a theory of justicecraft: language, narratives, and justice in restorative community conversations. Contemporary Justice Review 22(3), 257–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gissel, LE (2017) Contemporary Transitional Justice: Normalising a Politics of Exception. Global Society 31(3), 353–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodale, M and Merry, SE (2007) The Practice of Human Rights: Tracking Law Between the Global and the Local. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herremans, B and Destrooper, T (2021) Stirring the Justice Imagination: Countering the Invisibilization and Erasure of Syrian Victims’ Justice Narratives. International Journal of Transitional Justice 15(3), 576–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herremans, B and Destrooper, T (2022) Moving beyond formal truth practices and forensic truth in the Syrian conflict. How informal truth practices contribute to thicker understandings of truth. Social & Legal Studies, 32(4), 519–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ICC (2021) Situation in the Republic of the Philippines. ICC-01/21. International Criminal Court.Google Scholar
Kurze, A, Lamont, C and Robins, S (2015) Contested spaces of transitional justice: legal empowerment in global post-conflict contexts revisited. International Journal of Human Rights 19(3), 260–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lara, F and Champain, P (2009) Inclusive Peace In Muslim Mindanao: Revisiting the dynamics of conflict and exclusion . Understanding conflict. Building peace. London: International Alert.Google Scholar
Levitt, P and Merry, SE (2009) Vernacularization on the ground: local uses of global women’s rights in Peru, China, India and the United States. Global Networks 9(4), 441–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitt, P and Merry, SE (2011) Making women’s human rights in the vernacular: Navigating the culture/rights divide. In Hodgson, D (ed), Gender and Culture at the Limit of Rights. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Madlingozi, T (2010) On transitional justice entrepreneurs and the production of victims. Journal of Human Rights Practice 2(2).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAuliffe, P (2013) The roots of transitional accountability: interrogating the ‘justice cascade’. International Journal of Law in Context 9(1), 106–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAuliffe, P (2017) Transformative Transitional Justice and the Malleability of Post-Conflict States. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCoy, A (2001) Dark Legacy: Human rights under the Marcos regime. In Memory, Truth Telling, and the Pursuit of Justice: A Conference on the Legacies of the Marcos Dictatorship. Manila: Office of Research and Publications, Ateneo de Manila University, pp. 129–144.Google Scholar
McEvoy, K (2007) Beyond Legalism: Towards a thicker understanding of transitional justice. Journal of Law and Society 34(4), 411–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McEvoy, K and McConnachie, K (2013) Victims and Transitional Justice. Voice, Agency and Blame. Social and Legal Studies 22(4), 489–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendoza, MP (2013) Is Closure Still Possible for the Marcos Human Rights Victims? Social Transformations 1(1), 115–137.Google Scholar
Menkel-Meadow, C (2014) Cultural Variations in Restorative/Transitional Justice: Process Pluralism, Not One Size Fits All. Legal Studies Research Paper Series. University of California, Irvine - School of Law Georgetown Law Center.Google Scholar
Miller, Z (2008) Effects of invisibility. International Journal of Transitional Justice 17(2), 266–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelken, D (2017) Beyond Law in Context. Developing a Sociological Understanding of Law. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nyamu-Musembi, C (2002) Towards an actor-oriented perspective of human rights. In Kabeer, N (ed), Inclusive Citizenship: Meanings and Expressions. London: Zed Books, p. 31.Google Scholar
Pampolina, JT (2011) Desperate Transitional Times, Desperate Transitional Measures: Using Transitional Justice Mechanisms in Confronting Corruption in the Philippines. Philippine Law Journal 85(4), 819–845.Google Scholar
Posel, D (1999) The TRC Report: What kind of history? What kind of truth? Paper presented at the Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation, Johannesburg.Google Scholar
Robins, S (2017) Failing Victims? The Limits of Transitional Justice in Addressing the Needs of Victims of Violations. Human Rights & International Legal Discourse (HR&ILD) 11(1), 41–59. Available at: jurisquare.be/en/journal/hrild/11-1/failing-victims-the-limits-of-transitional-justice-in-addressing-the-needs-of-victims-of-violations/.Google Scholar
Robles, RE, Robles, A and Filipinos for A Better Philippines Inc. (2016) Marcos martial law: never again. Quezon City: Filipinos for a better Philippines Inc. Google Scholar
Roht-Arriaza, N (1999) Institutions of International Justice. Journal of International Affairs 52(2), 473–491.Google Scholar
Roht-Arriaza, N (2016) Measures of Non-Repetition in Transitional Justice: The Missing Link? In Gready, P and Robins, S (eds), From Transitional to Transformative Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roht-Arriaza, N and Mariezcurrena, J (2006) Transitional Justice in the Twenty-First Century. Beyond truth versus justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothberg, M (2009) Multidirectional Memory: Remembering the Holocaust in the Age of Decolonization. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Rothberg, M (2022) Lived multidirectionality: ‘Historikerstreit 2.0’ and the politics of Holocaust memory. Memory Studies 15(6), 1316–1329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rooney, E (2007) Engendering transitional justice: questions of absence and silence. International Journal of Law in Context 3(2), 173–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salonga, JR (2000) Presidential Plunder: The Quest for the Marcos Ill-Gotten Wealth. U.P. Center for Leadership, Citizenship and Democracy. Available at: https://books.google.be/books?id=41COAAAAMAAJ.Google Scholar
Sander, B (2019) The Expressive Turn of International Criminal Justice: A Field in Search of Meaning. Leiden Journal of International Law 32(4), 851–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharp, D (2014) Emancipating Transitional Justice from the Bonds of the Paradigmatic Transition. International Journal of Transitional Justice 9(1), 150–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silber, IC (2011) Everyday Revolutionaries: Gender, Violence, and Disillusionment in Postwar El Salvador. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Stahn, C (2020) Justice as Message. Expressivist Foundations of International Criminal Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Te, T (2011) Hints and Hues of Transitional Justice in The Philippines Over The Last Twenty-Five Years. Human rights in South East Asia Series 2, 136–157.Google Scholar
Transitional Justice and Reconciliation Commission (2016) Report of the Transitional Justice and Reconciliation Commission. Makati City: Transitional Justice and Reconciliation Commission.Google Scholar
Tugade, RR (2020) Beyond Legal Transformation: Assessing the Impact of Transitional Justice Mechanisms in the Philippines. Philippine Law Journal 93(1), 77–100.Google Scholar
Turner, C (2017) Transitional justice and critique. In: Lawther, C, Moffett, L, and Jacobs, D (eds) Research Handbook on Transitional Justice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 52–73.Google Scholar
Zunino, M (2019) Justice Framed: A Genealogy of Transitional Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar