Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T14:39:44.641Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Making Assessment Centers Work the Way They Are Supposed To

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Ann Howard
Ann Howard*
Affiliation:
Development Dimensions International
*
E-mail: ann.howard@ddiworld.com, Address: Development Dimensions International, 1225 Washington Pike, Bridgeville, PA 15017-2838
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , March 2008 , pp. 98 - 104
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2008 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bray, D. W. (1995). Centered on assessment (a retrospective review of Assessment of Men ). Personnel Psychology, 48, 468–471.Google Scholar
Donahue, L. M., Truxillo, D. M., Cornwell, J. M., & Gerrity, M. J. (1997). Assessment center construct validity and behavioral checklists: Some additional findings. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 12, 85–108.Google Scholar
Gaugler, B. B., Rosenthal, D. B., Thornton, G. C. III, & Bentson, C. (1987). Meta-analysis of assessment center validity. Journal of Applied Psychology Monograph, 72, 493–511.10.1037/0021-9010.72.3.493Google Scholar
Goffin, R. D., Rothstein, M. G., & Johnston, N. G. (1996). Personality testing and the assessment center: Incremental validity for managerial selection. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 746–756.10.1037/0021-9010.81.6.746Google Scholar
Howard, A. (Ed.). (1995). The changing nature of work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Howard, A. (1997). A reassessment of assessment centers: Challenges for the 21st century. Assessment centers: Research and applications [Special issue]. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 12, 13–52.Google Scholar
International Task Force on Assessment Center Guidelines. (2000). Guidelines and ethical considerations for assessment center operations. Public Personnel Management, 28, 315–331.Google Scholar
Kudisch, J. D., Ladd, R. T., & Dobbins, G. H. (1997). New evidence in the construct validity of diagnostic assessment centers: The findings may not be so troubling after all. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 12, 129–144.Google Scholar
Lance, C. E. (2008). Why assessment centers do not work the way they are supposed to. Industrial Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 1, 84–97.10.1111/j.1754-9434.2007.00017.xGoogle Scholar
Landy, F. J., Shankster-Cawley, L., & Moran, S. K. (1995). Advancing personnel selection and placement methods. In Howard, A. (Ed.), The changing nature of work (pp. 252–289). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Lievens, F., & Conway, J. M. (2001). Dimension and exercise variance in assessment center scores: A large-scale evaluation of multitrait-multimethod studies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1202–1222.10.1037/0021-9010.86.6.1202Google Scholar
Louiselle, K. G. (1980). Confirmatory factor analysis of two assessment center rating procedures. Paper presented at the 17th Annual IO/OB Graduate Student Conference, Minneapolis, MN.Google Scholar
Thornton, G. C. III, & Byham, W. C. (1982). Assessment centers and managerial performance. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar