Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T20:53:05.350Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Caring for Valid Sexual Consent

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 May 2024

Eli Benjamin Israel Open the ORCID record for Eli Benjamin Israel [Opens in a new window]
Eli Benjamin Israel*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Temple University, Philadelphia, USA
*
Email: elibenjamin@temple.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

When philosophers consider factors compromising autonomy in consent, they often focus solely on the consent-giver's agential capacities, overlooking the impact of the consent-receiver's conduct on the consensual character of the activity. In this paper, I argue that valid consent requires justified trust in the consent-receiver to act only within the scope of consent. I call this the Trust Condition (TC), drawing on Katherine Hawley's commitment account of trust. TC constitutes a belief that the consent-receiver is capable and willing to act as we expect from them. If such trust is not warranted, I argue, consent lacks the appropriate normative grounds. After establishing TC, I explore its application in the sexual arena, asserting that, due to the non-contractual dimensions of sexual activity—such as the dynamic nature of sexual desires and the absence of external factors effectively binding sexual partners to the terms of consent—trust is warranted in sexual consent by means of care. I define care as a special sensitivity and attention toward the partner's will and discuss how this approach leads to safer intimate relationships in practice.

Type
Article
Information
Hypatia , First View , pp. 1 - 21
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Hypatia, a Nonprofit Corporation

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alcoff, Linda Martín. 2018. rape and resistance: understanding the complexities of sexual violation. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Alexander, Larry. 2014. The ontology of consent. Analytic Philosophy 55 (1): 102–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/phib.12035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Ellie. 2022. A phenomenological approach to sexual consent. Feminist Philosophy Quarterly 8 (2). https://doi.org/10.5206/fpq/2022.2.14239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Michelle J. 2005. Negotiating sex. SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 782367. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=782367Google Scholar
Archard, David. 1997. Sexual consent. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
Baier, Annette. 1986. Trust and antitrust. Ethics 96 (2): 231–60. https://doi.org/10.1086/292745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Judith. 1987. Trust and rationality. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 68 (1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0114.1987.tb00280.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxter, Rachel. 2015. What is postcoital dysphoria (‘post-sex blues’)? ISSM. December 1, 2015. https://www.issm.info/sexual-health-qa/what-is-postcoital-dysphoria-post-sex-bluesGoogle Scholar
Carse, Alisa. 2010. Trust as robustly moral. Philosophic Exchange 40 (1): 1–18.Google Scholar
Christman, John. 2011. The politics of persons: Individual autonomy and socio-historical selves. Reissue ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dougherty, Tom. 2015. Yes means yes: Consent as communication. Philosophy and Public Affairs 43 (3): 224–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/papa.12059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dressler, Joshua. 1998. Where we have been, and where we might be going: Some cautionary reflections on rape law reform. The sixty-eighth Cleveland-Marshall Fund Lecture. Cleveland State Law Review 46 (3): 409.Google Scholar
Friedman, Jaclyn, and Valenti, Jessica. 2008. Yes means yes! Visions of female sexual power and a world without rape. Berkeley, CA: Seal Press.Google Scholar
Garcia, Manon. 2023. The joy of consent: A philosophy of good sex. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gheaus, Anca. 2022. Personal relationship goods. In The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, ed. Zalta, Edward N. and Nodelman, Uri, Winter. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2022/entries/personal-relationship-goods/Google Scholar
GQ. 2023. How to have a good time at a sex party, according to people who go to a lot of them. October 19. https://www.gq.com/story/how-to-have-a-good-time-at-a-sex-partyGoogle Scholar
Gray, Emma. 2018. On Aziz Ansari and sex that feels violating even when it's not criminal. HuffPost, January 16. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/aziz-ansari-sex-violating-but-not-criminal_n_5a5e445de4b0106b7f65b346Google Scholar
Grefte, Job de. 2023. Knowledge as justified true belief. Erkenntnis 88 (2): 531–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-020-00365-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamington, Maurice. 2004. Embodied care: Jane Addams, Maurice Merleau-Ponty, and feminist ethics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Hawley, Katherine. 2014. Trust, distrust and commitment. Noûs 48 (1): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawley, Katherine. 2019. How to be trustworthy. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawthorne, John. 2006. Knowledge and lotteries. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Healey, Richard. 2015. The ontology of consent: A reply to Alexander. Analytic Philosophy 56 (4): 354–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/phib.12070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Healey, Richard. 2019. Consent, rights, and reasons for action. Criminal Law and Philosophy 13 (3): 499–513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-018-9484-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Held, Virginia. 2007. The ethics of care: Personal, political, and global. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holton, Richard. 1994. Deciding to trust, coming to believe. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 72 (1): 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048409412345881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurd, Heidi M. 1996. The moral magic of consent. Legal Theory 2 (2): 121–46. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352325200000434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurd, Heidi M. 2004. Blaming the victim: A response to the proposal that criminal law recognize a general defense of contributory responsibility forum on comparative liability in criminal law. Buffalo Criminal Law Review 8 (2): 503–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husak, Douglas. 2006. The complete guide to consent to sex: Alan Wertheimer's consent to sexual relations. Law and Philosophy 25 (2): 267–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10982-005-8703-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ichikawa, Jonathan Jenkins, and Steup, Matthias. 2018. The analysis of knowledge. In The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, ed. Zalta, Edward N., Summer. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/knowledge-analysis/Google Scholar
Jones, Karen. 2004. Trust and terror. In Moral psychology: Feminist ethics and social theory, ed. DesAutels, Peggy and Walker, Margaret Urban. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1991. The metaphysics of morals, trans. Gregor, Mary J., 1st edition. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kattari, Shanna K. 2015. “Getting it”: Identity and sexual communication for sexual and gender minorities with physical disabilities. Sexuality and Culture: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly 19: 882–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-015-9298-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Killmister, Suzy. 2013. Autonomy and false beliefs. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition 164 (2): 513–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kukla, Quill R. 2021. A nonideal theory of sexual consent. Ethics 131 (2): 270–92. https://doi.org/10.1086/711209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kukla, Rebecca. 2018. That's what she said: The language of sexual negotiation. Ethics 129 (1): 70–97. https://doi.org/10.1086/698733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamb, Sharon, Gable, Sam, and de Ruyter, Doret. 2021. Mutuality in sexual relationships: A standard of ethical sex? Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 24 (1): 271–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-020-10150-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Little, Nicholas. 2005. From no means no to only yes means yes: The rational results of an affirmative consent standard in rape law. Vanderbilt Law Review 58 (4): 1321.Google Scholar
Manson, Neil C. 2016. Permissive consent: A robust reason-changing account. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition 173 (12): 3317–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margalit, Avishai. 2004. The ethics of memory : Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Margalit, Avishai. 2017. On betrayal. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, Elinor. 2021. Feminist philosophy: An introduction. Abingdon, Oxon, and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCain, Kevin. 2016. The traditional account of knowledge. In the nature of scientific knowledge: An explanatory approach, ed. McCain, Kevin. Springer Undergraduate Texts in Philosophy. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33405-9_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGregor, Joan. 2005. Is it rape? On acquaintance rape and taking women's consent seriously. Aldershot, Hants, and Burlington, VT: Routledge.Google Scholar
McLeod, Carolyn. 2021. Trust. In The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, ed. Zalta, Edward N., Fall. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entriesrust/Google Scholar
Mohr, Richard D. 1994. Gay ideas: Outing and other controversies. Reissue ed. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Moore, Delaine. 2023. Answers to your questions about what it's really like to be in a dom/sub relationship. SheKnows (blog). March 17. https://www.sheknows.com/health-and-wellness/articles/1129568/dom-sub-relationship/Google Scholar
Moran, Richard. 2005. Getting told and being believed. Philosophers’ Imprint 5: 1–29.Google Scholar
Murray, Bryan. 2012. Informed consent: What must a physician disclose to a patient? AMA Journal of Ethics 14 (7): 563–66. https://doi.org/10.1001/virtualmentor.2012.14.7.hlaw1-1207Google ScholarPubMed
O'Neill, Onora. 2002. Autonomy and trust in bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Q, Morgane. 2018. Sexual consent apps answer the wrong problem. Medium (blog). July 9. https://medium.com/@MorganeQ/why-sexual-consent-apps-are-the-worst-2dcbc4d1abde.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph. 1988. The morality of freedom. 1st paperback ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, Joseph. 2001. Liberty and trust. In Natural law, liberalism, and morality: Contemporary essays, ed. George, Robert. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199243006.003.0006Google Scholar
Renzo, Massimo. 2022. Defective normative powers: The case of consent. Journal of Practical Ethics 10 (1). https://doi.org/10.3998/jpe.2382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulhofer, Stephen J. 2000. Unwanted sex: The culture of intimidation and the failure of law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schweitzer, Robert D., O'Brien, Jessica, and Burri, Andrea. 2015. Postcoital dysphoria: Prevalence and psychological correlates. Sexual Medicine 3 (4): 235–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/sm2.74CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shah, Parth, Thornton, Imani, Turrin, Danielle, and Hipskind, John E.. 2023. Informed consent. In StatPearls. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK430827/Google Scholar
Silvers, Anita. 1995. Reconciling equality to difference: Caring (f)or justice for people with disabilities. Hypatia 10 (1): 30–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strawson, P. F. 2008. Freedom and resentment and other essays. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, Judith Jarvis. 1986. Liability and individualized evidence. Law and Contemporary Problems 49 (3): 199–219. https://doi.org/10.2307/1191633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wanderer, Jeremy, and Townsend, Leo. 2013. Is it rational to trust? Philosophy Compass 8 (1): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2012.00533.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, Mark Owen. 1992. The epistemology of trust and the politics of suspicion. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 73 (4): 390–400. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0114.1992.tb00346.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, Robin. 2009. Sex, law, and consent. In The ethics of consent, ed. Miller, Franklin and Wertheimer, Alan. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195335149.003.0009Google Scholar
Woodard, Elise. 2022. Bad sex and consent. In Handbook of sexual ethics, ed. Boonin, David. Basingstoke: Palgrave. https://philarchive.org/rec/WOOBSA-2Google Scholar