Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-09T18:48:46.340Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Colonialism and the Sovereignty of Peoples: A Dialogue between Hegel and the French Revolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 May 2024

Eduardo Baker Open the ORCID record for Eduardo Baker [Opens in a new window]
Eduardo Baker*
Affiliation:
Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil eduardo_bvp@yahoo.com.br
Get access

Abstract

This article discusses the relation between colonialism and the sovereignty of peoples through a dialogue between Hegel and the thought of the French Revolution. These two sides are relevant to each other not only because of their historical proximity, but also because of the connections that can be established when we approach the topic of colonialism through these two manifestations. Hegel is explicit that his philosophy of history and his philosophy of right are supposed to be philosophies of freedom. Yet despite the importance that he lends to freedom, Hegel also explicitly defends, in the very same text, colonial domination when he deals with the relation between peoples. A similar problem had arisen in the course of the French Revolution. Following the declarations of war, France is confronted on various occasions with the question of how to deal with other peoples and countries. With the foundation of the Republic in 1792, the relation with other peoples becomes central in the revolutionary debates. The topic of colonialism is part of the constituting debates, and not only because of the uprisings in then Saint Domingue leading to the Haitian Revolution. This article is a part of a larger research project that attempts to reassess the relations between Hegel and the French Revolution, and deals with the question of how we can re-read Hegel's interpretation of the French Revolution based on the evolving historiography of the Revolution. After an introduction of both sides of this dialogue, the paper discusses how Hegel's political philosophy can be applied to understand the debates about the emancipation of colonies that take place during the French Revolution. The next part further analyses some issues, such as the notion of sovereignty and, in the concluding remarks, I summarize my discussion and point to some avenues for further research.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hegel Bulletin , First View , pp. 1 - 27
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Hegel Society of Great Britain

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliography

For these texts, I use the notation commonly used by historians of the French Revolution to refer to the Archives Nationales of France, the reedition of the Archives parlementaires and the other French public archives.

Avineri, S. (1972), Hegel's Theory of the Modern State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, E. (2022), Human Rights and Humanity's Rights During Year Three of the French Revolution. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belissa, M. (1998), Fraternité Universelle et Intérêt National (1713–1795): Les Cosmopolitiques du Droit des Gens. Paris: Kimé.Google Scholar
Belissa, M. and Bosc, Y. (2018), Le Directoire: La République Sans la Démocratie. Paris: La Fabrique.Google Scholar
Benot, Y. (2004), La Révolution française et la Fin des Colonies (1789–1794). Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
Bernasconi, R. (1998), ‘Hegel at the Court of the Ashanti’, in Barnett, S. (ed.), Hegel After Derrida. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bernasconi, R. (2000), ‘With What Must the Philosophy of World History Begin? On the Racial Basis of Hegel's Eurocentrism’, Nineteenth-Century Contexts: An Interdisiciplinary Journal 22:2: 171–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biancardini, B. (2015), ‘L'Opinion Coloniale et la Question de la Relance de Saint-Domingue 1795–1802’, Annales Historiques de la Révolution française 382: 63–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosc, Y. (2016), La Terreur des Droits de L'homme. Le Républicanisme de Thomas Paine et le Moment Thermidorien. Paris: Kimé.Google Scholar
Brennan, T. (2014), Borrowed Light: Hegel, Vico, and the Colonies. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Buchwalter, A. (2012), Dialectics, Politics, and the Contemporary Value of Hegel's Practical Philosophy. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comay, R. (2011), Mourning Sickness: Hegel and the French Revolution. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Covo, M. (2012), ‘Les Comités des Colonies. Une Institution au Service de la « famille coloniale » (1789–1793)’, Cahiers de l'Institut d'Histoire de la Révolution Française 3.Google Scholar
Covo, M. and Maruschke, M. (2021), ‘The French Revolution as an Imperial Revolution’, French Historical Studies 44:3: 371–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crouin, C. (2008), ‘Les Sans-Cullotes Félicent la Convention nationale d'Avoir Aboli l'Esclavage dans les Colonies’, in Hoffmann, L.-F., Gewecke, F. and Fleichmann, U. (eds.), Haïti 1804 - Lumières et ténèbes. Impact et résonances d'une révolution. Frankfurt: Iberoamericana/Verviert.Google Scholar
D'Hondt, J. (1968), Hegel Secret: Recherches sur les Sources Cachées de la Pensée de Hegel. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Dorigny, M. (1993), ‘La Société des Amis des Noirs et les Projets de Colonisation en Afrique’, Annales Historiques de la Révolution française 293–94: 421–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferro, M. (1997), Colonization: A Global History. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gainot, B. (2005), ‘La Décade et la « colonisation nouvelle »’, Annales Historiques de la Révolution française 339: 99–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauthier, F. (1992), ‘La Révolution française et le Problème Colonial: Le Cas Robespierre’, Annales Historiques de la Révolution française 288: 169–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauthier, F. (2008). ‘La Révolution de Saint-Domingue ou la Conquêté de l’Égalité de l'Epiderme (1789–1804)’, in Hoffmann, L.-F., Gewecke, F. and Fleichmann, U. (eds.), Haïti 1804 - Lumières et ténèbes. Impact et résonances d'une révolution. Frankfurt: Iberoamericana/Verviert.Google Scholar
Gauthier, F. (2014), Triomphe et Mort de la Révolution des Droits de l'Homme et du Citoyen (1789–1795–1802). Paris: Syllepse.Google Scholar
Geggus, D. (ed.) (2014), The Haitian Revolution. A Documentary History. Cambridge: Hackett.Google Scholar
Ghachem, M. W. (2012), The Old Regime and the Haitian Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallward, P. (2009), ‘The Will of the People: Notes Towards a Dialectical Voluntarism’, Radical Philosophy 155: 17–29.Google Scholar
Hallward, P. (2022), ‘The Will of the People and the Struggle for Mass Sovereignty: A Preliminary Outline’, Crisis and Critique 9:2: 142–219.Google Scholar
Herzog, L. (2013), Inventing the Market: Smith, Hegel, and Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, C. L. R. (1989), The Black Jacobins. Toussaint L'Ouverture and the San Domingo Revolution. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Joseph, C. L. (2016), ‘On intellectual reparations: Hegel, Franklin Tavares, Susan Buck-Morss, revolutionary Haiti, and Caribbean Philosophical Association’, Journal of Pan African Studies 9:7: 167–75.Google Scholar
Kars, M. (2020), Blood on the River: A Chronicle of Mutiny and Freedom on the Wild Coast. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Kimmerle, H. (2016), ‘Hegel's Eurocentric Concept of Philosophy’, Confluence: Journal of World Philosophies 1: 99–117.Google Scholar
Le Chevanton, C. G. (2006), ‘Le procès Carrier. Enjeux politiques, pédagogie collective et construction mémorielle’, Annales Historiques de la Révolution française 343: 73–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCaskie, T. C. (2019), ‘Exiled from History: Africa in Hegel's Academic Practice’, History in Africa 46: 165–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narváez León, A. (2019), Hegel y la Economía Mundial: Crítica y Génesis de la Economía Política del Colonialismo. Valparaíso: Ediciones Universitarias de Valparaíso.Google Scholar
Nesbitt, N. (2008), Universal Emancipation. The Haitian Revolution and the Radical Enlightenment. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
Petry, M. J. (1976), ‘Hegel and “The Morning Chronicle”’, Hegel-Studien 11: 11–80.Google Scholar
Pinkard, T. (2012), Hegel's Naturalism: Mind, Nature, and the Final Ends of Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritter, J. (1984), Hegel and the French Revolution: essays on the Philosophy of Right. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (1904), An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, ed. Cannan, E.. London: Methuen & Co.Google Scholar
Spieler, M. F. (2009), ‘The Legal Structure of Colonial Rule during the French Revolution’, The William and Mary Quarterly 66:2: 365–408.Google Scholar
Stone, A. (2017), ‘Hegel and Colonialism’, Hegel Bulletin 41:2: 247–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tautz, B. (2012), ‘Revolution, Abolition, Aesthetic Sublimation: German Responses to News from France in the 1790s’, in Oergel, M. (ed.), (Re-)Writing the Radical: Enlightenment, Revolution and Cultural Transfer in 1790s Germany, Britain and France. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Tibebu, T. (2011), Hegel and the Third World: The Making of Eurocentrism in World History. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Wood, A. W. (1990), Hegel's Ethical Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zambrana, R. (2017), ‘Hegel, History, and Race’, in Zack, N. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Race. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ancién moniteur (Réimpression de l’), Seule Histoire Authentique et Inaltérée de la Révolution Française depuis la Réunion des États-Généraux jusqu'au Consulat (Mai 1789 – Novembre 1799), 31 t. Paris: Henri Plon Imprimeur-Éditeur, 1862–1863. [cited as ‘AM’, followed by tome number, page, and, when available, date].Google Scholar
Archives parlementaires de 1787 à 1869 (First series). Paris: Paul Dupont, 1867–2021. [cited as ‘AP’, followed by tome number, page, and, when available, date].Google Scholar
Barlow, J. (1793), Lettre a la Convention Nationale sur les Vices de la Constitution de 1791 et sur l’Étendue des Amendements a y Porter, pour Lesquelles cette Convention a Eté Convoquée, annex to the session of November 7th, 1792. AP 53: 286–297.Google Scholar
Demun, J.-J. (1792), Observation sur les Colonies Françaises Dans Leurs Rapports Avec la France. Archives Nationales, Series AD/XVIIIC/336, n. 2.Google Scholar
Edwards, G. (1793), Idées Pour Former une Nouvelle Constitution, et Pour Assurer la Prospérité et le Bonheur de la France et d'autres Nations, session of February 28th, 1793. AP59: 482–498.Google Scholar
Grégoire, H. J.-B. (1793), Discours, Déclaration du Droit de Gens, April 23th, 1793. AM 24: 294–96.Google Scholar
Lambert, C. (1793), Plan de Constitution Républicaine, Précédé de Quelques Observations sur Celui que le Comité de Constitution a Présenté a la Convention les 15 et 16 Février, annex to the session of April 17th, 1793. AP 62: 434–466.Google Scholar
Plan d'une Constitution Libre et Heureuse selon Justice, Raison et Sagesse, Trouvé Chez M. Laporte (n.d.), Archives Nationales, Series AD/XVIIIC/219, n. 14.Google Scholar
Ragonneau, (1793), Plan d'une Nouvelle Constitution, annex to the session of May 6th, 1793. AP 64:252–259.Google Scholar
Robespierre, M. M. I. de (1793), Déclaration, session of April 24th, 1793. AP 63: 198–200.Google Scholar
Ruault, A.-J. (n.d.), Projet de Constitution de la République Française. Portiez de l'Oise Collection, t. 176, n. 15.Google Scholar
Ancién moniteur (Réimpression de l’), Seule Histoire Authentique et Inaltérée de la Révolution Française depuis la Réunion des États-Généraux jusqu'au Consulat (Mai 1789 – Novembre 1799), 31 t. Paris: Henri Plon Imprimeur-Éditeur, 1862–1863. [cited as ‘AM’, followed by tome number, page, and, when available, date].Google Scholar
Archives parlementaires de 1787 à 1869 (First series). Paris: Paul Dupont, 1867–2021. [cited as ‘AP’, followed by tome number, page, and, when available, date].Google Scholar
Barlow, J. (1793), Lettre a la Convention Nationale sur les Vices de la Constitution de 1791 et sur l’Étendue des Amendements a y Porter, pour Lesquelles cette Convention a Eté Convoquée, annex to the session of November 7th, 1792. AP 53: 286–297.Google Scholar
Demun, J.-J. (1792), Observation sur les Colonies Françaises Dans Leurs Rapports Avec la France. Archives Nationales, Series AD/XVIIIC/336, n. 2.Google Scholar
Edwards, G. (1793), Idées Pour Former une Nouvelle Constitution, et Pour Assurer la Prospérité et le Bonheur de la France et d'autres Nations, session of February 28th, 1793. AP59: 482–498.Google Scholar
Grégoire, H. J.-B. (1793), Discours, Déclaration du Droit de Gens, April 23th, 1793. AM 24: 294–96.Google Scholar
Lambert, C. (1793), Plan de Constitution Républicaine, Précédé de Quelques Observations sur Celui que le Comité de Constitution a Présenté a la Convention les 15 et 16 Février, annex to the session of April 17th, 1793. AP 62: 434–466.Google Scholar
Plan d'une Constitution Libre et Heureuse selon Justice, Raison et Sagesse, Trouvé Chez M. Laporte (n.d.), Archives Nationales, Series AD/XVIIIC/219, n. 14.Google Scholar
Ragonneau, (1793), Plan d'une Nouvelle Constitution, annex to the session of May 6th, 1793. AP 64:252–259.Google Scholar
Robespierre, M. M. I. de (1793), Déclaration, session of April 24th, 1793. AP 63: 198–200.Google Scholar
Ruault, A.-J. (n.d.), Projet de Constitution de la République Française. Portiez de l'Oise Collection, t. 176, n. 15.Google Scholar