Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T11:06:42.037Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Breaking the spell

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 October 2008

Keith Davidson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Notes on regularities in the writing system of ‘the global language’, which both review Diane McGuinness, ‘Why Children Can't Read’ (1998), and comment on Christopher Upward, ‘In defence of spelling reform’ (ET57, Jan 99)

Type
Research Article
Information
English Today , Volume 15 , Issue 3 , July 1999 , pp. 3 - 11
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cox, Brian, ed. 1998. Literacy is not enough, Essays on the importance of reading. Manchester: University Press.Google Scholar
Department for Education and Employment (D/EE). 1998. The National Literacy Strategy Framework for Teaching. London: DfEE.Google Scholar
Dombey, Henrietta Moustafa, et al. 1998. Whole to part phonics: How children learn to read and spell. London: Centre for Language in Primary Education (CLPE).Google Scholar
McGuinness, Diane. 1998. Why Children Can't Read and What we can do about it. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Medwell, JaneWray, David, & Fox, Richard. 1998. Effective Teachers of Literacy. Exeter: University School of Education.Google Scholar
Mendick, Robert. 1998. ‘Scots throw down literacy gauntlet.’ In The Times Educational Supplement, Fri 6 11. London: The Times Supplements Ltd.Google Scholar
Miskin, Ruth. 1999. ‘Fast track to reading.’ In ‘Primary’, The Times Educational Supplement, Fri 01 22. London: The Times Supplements Ltd.Google Scholar
Office for Standards in Education. 1998. The National Literacy Project, an HMI evaluation. London: OFSTED.Google Scholar
Teacher Training Agency. 1998. Needs Assessment Materials for Key Stage 2 Teachers – Literacy. London: TTA.Google Scholar
Albrow, K. H. 1972. The English writing system: notes towards a description, Schools Council Programme in Linguistics and English Teaching Papers Series II, Volume 2. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Carney, Edward. 1994. A Survey of English Spelling. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Carol. 1970. ‘Reading, Writing, and Phonology.’ Reprinted from the Harvard Educational Review 40:2. In Smith, Frank, ed., 1973. Psycholinguistics and Reading. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Inc.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Halle, Morris. 1968. The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Stubbs, Michael. 1980. Language and literacy: The sociolinguistics of reading and writing, Chapter 3, ‘Some principles of English spelling.’ London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Stubbs, Michael. 1986. The Synchronic Organization of English Spelling, Committee for Linguistics in Education (British Association for Applied Linguistics, Iingi'i'stics Association of Great Britain) Working Papers No. 10. Birmingham: Aston University.Google Scholar
Wells, J.C. 1982. Accents of English I: An introduction. Cambridge: University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honey, John. 1997. Language is Power: The Story of Standard English and its Enemies. London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
McArthur, Tom. 1998. The English Languages. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Morris, Joyce M., ed., 1998. Controversial Issues in English: Proceedings of The Queen's English Society's Silver Jubilee conference, 18th October, 1997. London: Queen's English Society.Google Scholar
Peters, Pam. 1996. ‘In search of Australian style.’ In English Today 45. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Peters, Pam. 1998. ‘Langscape: Surveying contemporary English usage.’ In English Today 53 (and on-going). Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Upward, Christopher. 1988. English Spelling and Educational Progress, Committee for Linguistics in Education (British Association for Applied Linguistics, Linguistics Association of Great Britain) Working Papers No. 11.Google Scholar
Upward, Christopher. 1998. ‘From the Simplified Spelling Society: A Response to Langscape 1.’ In English Today 55. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Upward, Christopher. 1999. ‘In defence of spelling reform.’ In English Today 57. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar