Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-11T05:28:33.601Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Accurate quantitative analysis of clay and other minerals in sandstones by XRD: comparison of a Rietveld and a reference intensity ratio (RIR) method and the importance of sample preparation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2018

S. Hillier
S. Hillier*
Affiliation:
Macaulay Land Use Research Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen AB15 8QH, UK
*
*E-mail: s.hillier@mluri.sari.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

X-ray diffraction is used widely for quantitative analysis of geological samples but studies which document the accuracy of the methods employed are not numerous. Synthetic sandstones of known composition are used to compare a ‘routine application’ of a Rietveld and a reference intensity ratio (RIR) method of quantitative phase analysis. Both methods give similar results accurate to within ~±3 wt.% at the 95% confidence level. The high degree of accuracy obtained is believed to depend to a large extent on the spray-drying method of sample preparation used to eliminate preferred orientation.

Keywords

XRDquantitative analysisRietveld analysis
Type
Research Article
Information
Clay Minerals , Volume 35 , Issue 1 , March 2000 , pp. 291 - 302
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Batchelder, M. & Cressey, G. (1998) Rapid, accurate phase quantification of clay bearing samples using a position sensitive X-ray detector. Clays Clay Miner. 46, 46–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bish, D.L. (1993) Studies of clays and clay minerals using X-ray powder diffraction and the Rietvled method. Pp. 80–121, in: Computer Applications to X-ray Powder Diffraction Analysis of Clay Minerals (Reynolds, R.C. Jr. & Walker, J.R., editors). Clay Minerals Society, Workshop Lectures, 5. Colorado, USA.Google Scholar
Bish, D.L. (1994) Quantitative X-ray diffraction analysis of soils. Pp 267–295 in: Quantitative Methods in Soil Mineralogy (Amonette, J.E. & Zelazny, L.W., editors). Soil Science Society of America, Madison, USA.Google Scholar
Bish, D.L. & Chipera SJ. (1988) Problems and solutions in quantitative analysis of complex mixtures by X-ray powder difraction. Adv. X-ray Anal. 31, 31–295.Google Scholar
Bish, D.L. & Post, J.E. (1993) Quantitative mineralogical analysis using the Rietveld full-pattern fitting method. Am. Miner. 78, 78–932.Google Scholar
Bish, D.L. & Reynolds, R.C. Jr. (1989) Sample preparation for X-ray diffraction. Pp. 73–99 in: Modern Powder Difraction (Bish, D.L. & Post, J.E., editors). Reviews in Mineralogy, 20, Mineralogical Society of America, Washington, USA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brindley, G.W. (1980) Quantitative X-ray mineral analysis of clays. Pp. 411–438 in: Crystal Structures of Clay Minerals and their X-ray Identification (Brindley, G.W. & G. Brown, editors). Monograph 5, Mineralogical Society, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvert, C.S., Palkowsky, D.A. & Pevear, D.R. (1989) A combined X-ray powder diffraction and chemical method for the quantitative mineral analysis of geological samples. Pp. 154–166 in: Quantitative Mineral Analysis of Clays (Pevear, D.R. & Mumpton, F.A.. editors). Clay Minerals Society, Workshop Lectures, 5. Colorado, USA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chipera, S.J. & Bish, D.L. (1995) Multi-reflection RTR and intensity normalizations for quantitative analyses: Applications to feldspars and zeolites. Powder Diffi 10, 10–47.Google Scholar
Chung, F.H. (1974) Quantitative interpretation of X-ray diffraction patterns of mixtures. I. Matrix-flushing method for quantitative multicomponent analysis. J. App. Cryst. 7, 7–519.Google Scholar
Cressey, G. & Schofield, P.F. (1995) Rapid whole-pattern profile-stripping method for the quantification of multiphase samples. Powder Diffi 11, 11–35.Google Scholar
Davis, B.L. & Walawender, M.J. (1982) Quantitative mineralogical analysis of granitoid rocks: a comparison of X-ray and optical techniques. Am. Miner. 67, 67–1135.Google Scholar
Eslinger, E. & Pevear, D.R. (1988) Clay Minerals for Petroleum Geologists and Engineers. Society for Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Tulsa, USA. SEPM short course notes, 22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkin, R. & Snyder, R.L. (1996) X-ray Powder Diffractometry. John Wiley & Sons, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, R.J., Tsambourakis, G. & Masden, I.C. (1993) Improved petrological modal analyses from X-ray powder diffraction data by use of the Rietveld method I. Selected igneous, volcanic and metamorphic rocks. J. Pet. 34, 34–876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillier, S. (1999) Use of an air-brush to spray dry samples for X-ray powder diffraction. Clay Miner. 34, 34–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, D.M. & Reynolds, R.C. Jr. (1997) X-ray Diffraction and the Identification and Analysis of Clay Minerals, 2nd Edition. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Mumme, W.G., Tsambourakis, G., Masden, I.C. & Hill, R.J. (1996) Improved petrological modal analyses from X-ray powder diffraction data by use of the Rietveld method I. Selected sedimentary rocks. J. Sed. Res. 66, 66–132.Google Scholar
Pevear, D.R. & Mumpton, F.A. (editors) (1989) Quantitative Mineral Analysis of Clays. Clay Minerals Society, Workshop Lectures, 1. Colorado, USA.Google Scholar
Reynolds, R.C. Jr. (1989) Principles and techniques of quantitative analysis of clay minerals by X-ray powder diffraction. Pp. 4–36 in: Quantitative Mineral Analysis of Clays (Pevear, D.R. & Mumpton, F.A., editors). Clay Minerals Society, Workshop Lectures, 1. Colorado, USA.Google Scholar
Schreiner, W.N. (1995) A standard test method for the determination of RIR values by X-ray diffraction. Powder Diff 10, 10–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, R.L. & Bish, D.L. (1989) Quantitative analysis. Pp. 101-144 in: Modern Powder Diffraction (Bish, D.L. & Post, J.E., editors). Reviews in Mineralogy, 20, Mineralogical Society of America, Washington, USA.Google Scholar
Taylor, J.C. (1991) Computer programs for standardless quantitative analysis of minerals using the full powder diffraction profile. Powder Diff. 6, 6–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J.C. & Matulis, C.E. (1994) A new method for Rietveld clay analysis. Part 1. Use of a universal measured standard profile for Rietveld quantification of montmorillonites. Powder Diff 9, 9–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornley, D.M. & Primmer, T.J. (1995) Thermogravitmetry/evolved water analysis (TG/EWA) combined with XRD for improved quantitative whole-rock analysis of clay minerals in sandstones. Clay Miner. 30, 30–27.Google Scholar
Wilson, M.J., editor (1987) A Handbook of Determinative Methods in Clay Mineralogy. Blackie & Son, New York.Google Scholar