Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T18:57:09.242Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Canadian raising

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

J. K. Chambers
J. K. Chambers*
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This Paper discusses a particular phonological rule that occurs in several English dialects, including Canadian English. The rule will be referred to throughout as ‘Canadian Raising’ purely for mnemonic purposes; no geographical rigour is intended by the epithet ‘Canadian’—a point that is made abundantly clear in §4, where the distribution of the rule is taken up. The appropriateness of the term resides in the relative role the rule plays in Canadian English, where its effect is the most readily identifiable trait of the dialect. Thus, speakers of Canadian English are often identified by the speakers of adjoining dialects by their pronunciation of words like wife and south, which are usually mis-heard by speakers of General American as weef and sooth.

The main facts about Canadian Raising were first organized systematically three decades ago by Martin Joos, in a short article entitled “A phonological dilemma in Canadian English” (1942). Since then, they have been cursorily referred to in the literature several times (for example: Bloomfield 1948: 62; McDavid 1963: 470, etc.) and have been reorganized in a different theoretical framework (Halle 1962: 343) with no augmentation—and usually a simplification—of Joos’s observations.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , Fall 1973 , pp. 113 - 135
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bloomfield, Morton W. 1948 Canadian English and its relation to eighteenth century American speech. Journal of English and Germanic Philology 47. 59–67.Google Scholar
Chambers, J. K. 1971 A phonological argument for the derivation of the ø-subclass. Papers in Linguistics 4. 433–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam 1964 Current Issues in Linguistic Theory. The Hague: Mouton [Janua Linguarum, Series Minor, 38].Google Scholar
CHomsky, Noam and Halle, Morris 1968 The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris 1962 Phonology in generative grammar. In The Structure of Language, Katz, Fodor & (eds.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1964. pp. 334–52 [Original: Word 18. 54–72 (1962)].Google Scholar
Halle, Morris and Jay Keyser, Samuel 1971 English Stress: its Form, its Growth, and its Role in Verse. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Hoard, James E. 1971 Aspiration, tenseness and syllabication in English. Language 47. 133–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joos, Martin 1942 A phonological dilemma in Canadian English. Language 18. 141–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenyon, John Samuel and Knott, Thomas Albert 1944 A Pronouncing Dictionary of American English. Springfield: Merriam.Google Scholar
Klparsky, Paul 1968 universals, Linguistic and linguistic change. In Universals in Linguistic Theory, Harms, Bach & (eds.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, pp. 170–202.Google Scholar
Klparsky, Paul 1971 Historical linguistics. In A Survey of Linguistic Science. Dingwall, W. O. (ed.). College Park: University of Maryland, pp. 576–649.Google Scholar
Kurath, Hans and McDavid, Raven I. Jr., 1961 The Pronunciation of English in the Atlantic States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press [Studies in American English, 3].Google Scholar
Labov, William 1963 The social motivation of a sound change. Word 19. 273–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William 1965 On the mechanism of linguistic change. Georgetown University Monographs on Language and Linguistics 18. 91–114.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Philip 1965 On the acoustic basis of the perception of intonation by linguists. In Language: Selected Readings, Oldfield & Marshall (eds.). Penguin Books, 1968, pp. 107–22 [Original: Word 21. 40–54 (1965)].Google Scholar
McDavid, Raven I. JR., 1963 Mencken’s ‘The American Language’. One volume abridged edition with new material, edited with the assistance of Maurer, David W.. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Sledd, James H. 1966 Breaking, umlaut and the Southern drawl. Language 42. 18–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar