Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T17:06:26.025Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Acquisition of Wh-Question Formation by Malagasy Learners of English: Evidence for Universal Grammar

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Lydia White ,
Lisa Travis  and
Anna MacLachlan
Lydia White
Affiliation:
McGill University
Lisa Travis
Affiliation:
McGill University
Anna MacLachlan
Affiliation:
McGill University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In investigations of the question of whether or not Universal Grammar (UG) is available in non-primary language acquisition, a number of researchers have tried to isolate situations where the way principles of UG operate in the first language (L1) could not help the learner acquire the relevant properties of the second language (L2). If learners show evidence of acquiring properties of the L2 that could not be acquired from the input alone and could not be reconstructed via the L1, this suggests that UG is available in non-primary acquisition; in contrast, if learners fail under such circumstances, this supports the claim that UG is no longer directly accessible. In particular, there has been a tradition of looking at island constraints in this light, using L1s and L2s which differ radically in terms of the surface effects of principles like Subjacency and the Empty Category Principle (ECP) (e.g., Bley-Vroman et al 1988; Johnson and Newport 1991; Martohardjono 1991a, 1991b; Martohardjono and Gair 1992; Schachter 1989, 1990; White 1989, 1992).

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 37 , Issue 3 , September 1992 , pp. 341 - 368
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Birdsong, David 1989 Metalinguistic Competence and Interlinguistic Performance. New York: Springer. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bley-Vroman, Robert 1990 The Logical Problem of Foreign Language Learning. Linguistic Analysis 20:3–49.Google Scholar
Bley-Vroman, , Robert, , Felix, Sascha, and loup, Georgette 1988 The Accessibility of Universal Grammar in Adult Language Learning. Second Language Research 4:1 –32.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam 1981 Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam 1986 Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar
Georgopoulos, Carol 1991 Canonical Government and the Specifier Parameter: An ECP Account of Weak Crossover. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9:1–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane, and Rosen, Sarah 1990 Knowledge and Obedience: The Developmental Status of the Binding Theory. Linguistic Inquiry 21:187–222.Google Scholar
Guilfoyle, , Eithne, , Hung, Henrietta, and Travis, Lisa 1992 SPEC of IP and SPEC of VP: Two Subjects in Austronesian languages. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. [In press.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, James 1982 Logical Relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. PhD thesis, MIT.Google Scholar
Johnson, Jacqueline, and Newport, Elissa 1991 Critical Period Effects on Universal Properties of Language: The Status of Subjacency in the Acquisition of a Second Language. Cognition 39:215–258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kayne, Richard 1984 Connectedness and Binary Branching. Dordrecht: Foris. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martohardjono, Gita 1991a Gradience in Acceptability in Second Language Acquisition. Paper presented at the Second Language Research Forum, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Martohardjono, Gita 1991b Universal Properties in the L2 Acquisition of Wh-Questions: A Comparison of Learners from Movement and Non-Movement Ll Backgrounds. Paper presented at the Boston University Conference on Language Development, Boston.Google Scholar
Martohardjono, Gita, and Gair, James 1992 Apparent UG Inaccessibility in Second Language Acquisition: Misapplied Principles or Principled Misapplications? In Confluence: Linguistics, Second Language Acquisition and Speech Pathology. Eckman, Fred, ed. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [In press.]Google Scholar
Otsu, Yukio 1981 Universal Grammar and Syntactic Development in Children: Toward a Theory of Syntactic Development. PhD thesis, MIT.Google Scholar
Phinney, Marianne 1981 Syntactic Constraints and the Acquisition of Embedded Sentential Complements. PhD thesis, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.Google Scholar
Ritter, Elizabeth 1987 NSO Noun Phrases in Modern Hebrew. Pp. 521–538 in Proceedings of NELS 17. McDonough, Joyce and Plunkett, Bernadette, eds. University of Massachusetts at Amherst: Graduate Students Linguistics Association.Google Scholar
Schachter, Jacquelyn 1989 Testing a Proposed Universal. Pp. 73–88 in Linguistic Perspectives on Second Language Acquisition. Schachter, Jacquelyn and Gass, Susan, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schachter, Jacquelyn 1990 On the Issue of Completeness in Second Language Acquisition. Second Language Research 6:93 –124.Google Scholar
Sobin, Nicholas 1987 The Variable Status of Comp-Trace Phenomena. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5:33 – 60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sportiche, Dominique 1990 Movement, Agreement, and Case. Ms.Google Scholar
White, Lydia 1986 Implications of Parametric Variation for Adult Second Language Acquisition: An Investigation of the “Pro-Drop” Parameter. Pp. 55–72 in Experimental Approaches to Second Language Acquisition. Cook, Vivian, ed. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
White, Lydia 1989 Universal Grammar and Second Language Acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Lydia 1992 Subjacency Violations and Empty Categories in L2 Acquisition. Pp. 445–464 in Island Constraints. Goodluck, Helen and Rochemont, Michael, eds. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossRefGoogle Scholar