Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-19T17:38:33.661Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THEOPHRASTUS’ ‘OLIGARCH’ AND THE POLITICAL INTENTION OF THE CHARACTERS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2023

Katie Ebner-Landy  and
René de Nicolay
Katie Ebner-Landy*
Affiliation:
Society of Fellows, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
René de Nicolay*
Affiliation:
History Seminar, University of Zürich, Zürich, CH
*
*Corresponding authors. Emails: kebnerlandy@fas.harvard.edu and renedenicolay@gmail.com
*Corresponding authors. Emails: kebnerlandy@fas.harvard.edu and renedenicolay@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The intention of Theophrastus’ Characters still escapes us. This paper offers a new answer to that centuries-old question by looking closely at the one political sketch of the collection: ‘The Oligarch’ (C.26). We argue that C.26 reveals a political intention in the Characters, presenting oligarchy as the inherently flawed projection of a character trait onto political events. Read in this way, C.26 appears as a medium through which Theophrastus can take a definite but careful stance in contemporary Athenian politics.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Cambridge Classical Journal , Volume 69 , December 2023 , pp. 1 - 21
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Cambridge Philological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswick, E., Levinson, D. and Sanford, N. (1950) The authoritarian personality, New York.Google Scholar
Aly, W. (ed.) (1943) Fragmentum Vaticanum De eligendis magistratibus, e codice bis rescripto Vat. Gr. 2306, . . .; accedunt tabulae III, Rome.Google Scholar
Azoulay, V. (2009) ‘La gloire et l'outrage. Heurs et malheurs des statues honorifiques de Démétrios de Phalère’, Annales (HSS) 64, 303–40.Google Scholar
Balot, R. (2009) ‘The virtue politics of democratic Athens’, in Salkever, S. (ed.) The Cambridge companion to ancient Greek political thought, Cambridge and New York, 271–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassi, K. (2003) ‘The semantics of manliness in ancient Greece’, in Rosen, R. M., Sluiter, I. (eds.) Andreia: studies in manliness and courage in classical antiquity, Leiden, 25–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayliss, A. (2011) After Demosthenes: the politics of early Hellenistic Athens, London.Google Scholar
Blössner, N. (1998) Dialogform und Argument. Studien zu Platons ‘Politeia’, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Bodei Giglioni, B. (1980) ‘Immagini di una società. Analisi storica dei “Caratteri” di Teofrasto’, Athenaeum 58, 73–102.Google Scholar
Bodéüs, R. (1991) Politique et philosophie chez Aristote: recueil d’études, Namur.Google Scholar
Brun, P. (1983) Eisphora-syntaxis-stratiotika, Paris.Google Scholar
Brun, P. (2000) L'orateur Démade. Essai d'histoire et d'historiographie, Bordeaux.Google Scholar
Bultrighini, U. (1999) Maledetta democrazia. Studi su crizia, Alessandria.Google Scholar
Caire, E. (2016) Penser l'oligarchie à Athènes aux Vè et IVè siècles. Aspects d'une idéologie, Paris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caire, E. (2020) ‘Qui a lu l'Athénaiôn politeia? La réception du pamphlet dans l'antiquité’, in Lenfant, D. (ed.) ‘Les aventures d'un pamphlet antidémocratique: transmission et réception de la Constitution des Athéniens du Pseudo-Xénophon (Ve siècle avant J.-C.–XXIe siècle)’, Actes du colloque de Strasbourg (15–16 novembre 2018), Paris, 25–52.Google Scholar
Cawkwell, G. L. (1984) ‘Athenian naval power in the fourth century’, CQ 34, 334–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christ, M. R. (2006) The bad citizen in classical Athens, Cambridge and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diggle, J. (2004) Theophrastus: Characters, Cambridge Classical Texts and Commentaries 43, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Dmitriev, S. (2021) The orator Demades: Classical Greece reimagined through rhetoric, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebner-Landy, K. (2022) ‘Did Theophrastus deliver Eresus from tyrants?’, forthcoming in CQ.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, W. S. (1911) ‘The laws of Demetrius of Phalerum and their guardians’, Klio 11, 265–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrari, G. R. F. (2003) City and soul in Plato's Republic, Chicago.Google Scholar
Fisher, N. R. E. (2003) ‘“Let envy be absent”: envy, liturgies and reciprocity in Athens’, in Konstan, D., Rutter, N. K. (eds.) Envy, spite and jealousy: the rivalrous emotions in ancient Greece, Edinburgh, 181–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W. W. (1975) ‘Die Charaktere Theophrasts: Verhaltensregelmäßigkeiten und Aristotelische Laster’, RhM 118, 62–82.Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W. W., Huby, P.M., Sharples, R.W. and Gutas, D. (1993) Theophrastus of Eresus. Sources for his life, writings, thought and influence, Leiden. (FHS&G)Google Scholar
Fröhlich, Pierre (2004) Les cités grecques et le contrôle des magistrats (IVe - Ier siècle avant J.-C), Geneva and Paris.Google Scholar
Gehrke, H.-J. (1976) Phokion. Studien zur Erfassung seiner historischen Gestalt, Munich.Google Scholar
Gygax, M. D. (2003) ‘Euergetismus und Gabentausch’, in Angliviel, Laurent, Bonnards, Jean-Baptiste, Borgeaud, Philippe et al. (eds.) Alexandre le Grand, religion et tradition, Paris, 181–200.Google Scholar
Haake, M. (2008) ‘Das “Gesetz des Sophokles” und die Schließung der Philosophenschulen in Athen unter Demetrios Poliorketes’, in Hugonnard-Roche, H. (ed.) L'enseignement supérieur dans les mondes antiques et médiévaux, Paris, 89–112.Google Scholar
Habicht, C. (1997) Athens from Alexander to Antony, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hansen, M. H. (1991) The Athenian democracy in the age of Demosthenes: structure, principles, and ideology, trans. Crook, J. A., Oxford and Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hornblower, S. (2010) ‘The Old Oligarch (Pseudo-Xenophon's Athenaion politeia) and Thucydides: a fourth-century date for the Old Oligarch?’ in (id.) Thucydidean themes, Oxford and New York, 324–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iacoviello, A. (2021) ‘Exemplarity and politics of memory: the recovery of the Piraeus by Olympiodoros of Athens’, CQ, 1–7.Google Scholar
Ilberg, J. (1897) ‘ΟΛΙΓΑΡΧΙΑΣ ΚΣ’, in Bechert, B., Cichorius, C., Giesecke, A. et al. (eds.) Theophrasts Charaktere, herausgegeben, erklärt und übersetzt von der philologischen Gesellschaft zu Leipzig, Leipzig, 217–27.Google Scholar
Jebb, R. C. (1870) The Characters of Theophrastus, London and Cambridge.Google Scholar
Keaney, J. J., Szegedy-Maszak, A. (1976) ‘Theophrastus’ De eligendis magistratibus: Vat. Gr. 2306, Fragment B’, TAPhA 106, 227–40.Google Scholar
Landucci Gattinoni, F. (2001) ‘Il ruolo di Adimanto di Lampsaco nella “basileia” di Demetrio Poliorcete’, in Capasso, M., Pernigotti, S. (eds.) Studium atque urbanitas: miscellanea in onore di Sergio Daris, Galatina, 211–25.Google Scholar
Lane Fox, R. J. (1996) ‘Theophrastus’ Characters and the historian’, PCPS 42, 127–70.Google Scholar
Laslett, P. (1976) ‘The wrong way through the telescope: a note on literary evidence in sociology and in historical sociology’, BrJSociol. 27, 319–42.Google Scholar
Lear, J. (1999) ‘Inside and outside the Republic’ in (id.) Open-minded: working out the logic of the soul, Cambridge, 219–46.Google Scholar
Lehmann, G. A. (1997) Oligarchische Herrschaft im klassischen Athen. Zu den Krisen und Katastrophen der attischen Demokratie im 5. und 4. Jahrhundert v. Chr., Wiesbaden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenfant, D. (2017) Pseudo-Xénophon. Constitution des Athéniens, Paris.Google Scholar
Liddel, P. (2007) Civic obligations and individual liberty in ancient Athens, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luraghi, N. (2014) ‘Stratokles of Diomeia and party politics in early Hellenistic Athens’, C&M 65, 191–226.Google Scholar
Millett, P. (1998) ‘Encounters in the Agora’, in Cartledge, P., Millett, P., von Reden, S. (eds.) Kosmos: essays in order, conflict and community in Classical Athens, Cambridge, 203–28.Google Scholar
Millett, P. (2007) Theophrastus and his world, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Nagy, G. (1996) Poetry as performance: Homer and beyond. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Navarre, O. (1924) Caractères de Théophraste: commentaire exégétique et critique précédé d'une introduction sur l'origine du livre, l'histoire du texte et le classement des manuscrits, Paris.Google Scholar
Ober, J. (1989) Mass and elite in democratic Athens: rhetoric, ideology, and the power of the people, Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Sullivan, L. (2009) The regime of Demetrius of Phalerum in Athens, 317–307 BCE: a philosopher in politics, Leiden and Boston.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasquali, G. (1919) Teofrasto. I Caratteri, Florence.Google Scholar
Podlecki, A. (1985) ‘Theophrastus on history and politics’, in Fortenbaugh, W. W., Huby, P., Long, A. A. (eds.) Theophrastus of Eresus: on his life and work, vol. 2, New York, 231–50.Google Scholar
Pownall, F. (2008) ‘Critias’ commemoration of Athens’, Mouseion (Canada) 8, 333–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ranocchia, G. (2011) ‘Natura e fine dei Caratteri di Teofrasto. Storia di un enigma’, Philologus 155, 69–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roisman, J. (2003) ‘The rhetoric of courage in the Athenian orators’, in Rosen, R. M., Sluiter, I. (eds.) Andreia. Studies in manliness and courage in classical antiquity, Leiden and Boston, 127–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rusten, J. S., Campbell Cunnigham, I. (2002) Theophrastus: Characters; Herodas: Mimes; Sophron and other mime fragments. Cambridge (MA).Google Scholar
Schneider, J.-P. (2016) ‘Théophraste d'Erèse’, in Goulet, R. (ed.) Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques, vol. 6, Paris, 1033–1123.Google Scholar
Sikkenga, J. (2002) ‘Plato's examination of the oligarchic soul in book 8 of the Republic’, HPTh 23, 377–400.Google Scholar
Sikkenga, J. (2011) ‘Overcoming oligarchy: republicanism and the right to property in The Federalist’, in Tabachnick and Koivukoski (2011), 47–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, M. (2017) Classical Greek oligarchy: a political history, Princeton.Google Scholar
Skinner, Q. R. D. (1969) ‘Meaning and understanding in the history of ideas’, History and Theory 8, 3–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skultety, S. (2011) ‘The threat of misguided elites: Aristotle on oligarchy’, in Tabachnick and Koivukoski (2011), 90–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spina, L. (1981) ‘Un oligarca nella crisi della città (Theophr., Char., XXVI)’, Quaderni di Storia 13, 271–9.Google Scholar
Stein, M. (1997) Definition und Schilderung in Theophrasts Charakteren, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Steinmetz, P. (1960) Theophrast. Charaktere herausgegeben und erklärt, Munich.Google Scholar
Szegedy-Maszak, A. (1981) The ‘Nomoi’ of Theophrastus. New York.Google Scholar
Tabachnick, D. E., Koivukoski, T. (eds.) (2011) On oligarchy: ancient lessons for global politics, Toronto.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tritle, L. A. (1988) Phocion the good, London.Google Scholar
Ussher, R. G. (1960) The Characters of Theophrastus: edited with introduction, commentary and index, Bristol.Google Scholar
Volt, I. (2007) Character description and invective: Peripatetics between ethics, comedy and rhetoric. Tartu.Google Scholar
Whitehead, D. (1993) ‘Cardinal virtues: the language of public approbation in democratic Athens’, C&M 44, 37–75.Google Scholar
Williams, B. (2006) ‘The analogy of city and soul in Plato's Republic’, in The sense of the past: essays in the history of philosophy, Princeton, 108–17.Google Scholar
Worthington, I. (2021) Athens after empire: a history from Alexander the Great to the Emperor Hadrian, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar