Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-06-02T10:17:44.778Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Austria's “Ostpolitik” in the 1950s and 1960s: Honest Broker or Double Agent?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2009

Oliver Rathkolb
Affiliation:
Research Director of the Bruno Kreisky Archives Foundation, Rechte Wienzeile 97, A-1050 Vienna, Austria. He is also Research Coordinator of the Bruno Kreisky Forum for International Dialogue, Codirector of the Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for History and Society, and Universitätsdozent in History at the University of Vienna.

Extract

In literature on diplomacy, the term Ostpolitik refers to the new foreign policy of the Federal Republic of Germany introduced in 1966. The policy, was initiated by the grand coalition of the Christian Democratic Union (CDU), the Christian Social Union (CSU), and the Social Democratic party (SPD) and was continued after 1969 by the SPD and Free Democratic party (FDP) coalition. The policy aimed at reconciling Germany with Poland and the Soviet Union. Willy Brandt, the SPD foreign minister from 1966 to 1969 and chancellor from 1969 until 1974, and Walter Scheel, FDP foreign minister from 1969 to 1974, were the architects of this new “selective Détente.” From the beginning, Brandt's Ostpolitik was “controlled” by the Nixon administration, especially by Kissinger. The United States feared that Brandt and Scheel would go too far without taking account of Washington's geo-political point of view.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Center for Austrian Studies, University of Minnesota 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Henry Kissinger, cited in Clemens, Clay, “Amerikanische Entspannungs- und deutsche Ost-politik 1969–1975,” in Die USA und die Deutsche Frage 1945–1990, ed. Friedrich, Wolfgang-Uwe (Frankfurt am Main 1991), 208Google Scholar.

2 Craig, Gordon A., “Did Ostpolitik Work? The Path to German Reunification,” Foreign Affairs 73 (1994): 163CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 Hanrieder, Wolfram F., Germany, America, Europe: Forty Years of German Foreign Policy (New Haven, Conn., 1989), 176–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 For a complete international history of post-1945 Austria, see Bischof, Günter, “Between Responsibility and Rehabilitation: Austria in International Politics, 1940–1950” (Ph.D. diss., Harvard University, 1989), vols. 1 and 2. Further valuable analysis and references can be found inGoogle ScholarCronin, Audrey Kurth, Great Power Politics and the Struggle over Austria, 1945–1955 (Ithaca, N.Y., 1986)Google Scholar; Larson, Deborah Welch, “Crisis Prevention and the Austrian State Treaty,” International Organization 41 (1987): 2760CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Steiner, Kurt, “Negotiations for an Austrian State Treaty,” in U.S.-Soviet Security Cooperation, Achievements, Failures, Lessons, ed. George, Alexander L., Farley, Philip J., and Dallin, Alexander (London, 1988), 4682Google Scholar; Hillhouse, Raelynn J., “A Reevaluation of Soviet Policy in Central Europe: The Soviet Union and the Occupation of Austria,” Eastern European Politics and Societies 3 (1989): 83104CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 For an overview, see Rauchensteiner, Manfried, Die Zwei. Die Groβe Koalition in Österreich 1945–1966 (Vienna, 1987)Google Scholar.

6 More details for the period up to 1955 are in Bischof, Günter, “Österreichische Neutralität, die Deutsche Frage und Europäische Sicherheit 1953–1955,” in Die doppelte Eindämmung. Europäische Sicherheit und deutsche Frage in den Fünfzigern, ed. Steininger, Rolf, Weber, Jürgen, Bischof, Günter, Albrich, Tomas, and Eisterer, Klaus (Munich, 1993), 133–76Google Scholar. Concerning the discussion about Austria as a special case or a model for Germany, see Steininger, Rolf, “1955: The Austrian State Treaty and the German Question,” Diplomacy and Statecraft 3 (1992): 494522CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 Concerning Austrian Ostpolitik in the framework of American-Austrian relations, see Rathkolb, Oliver, Washington ruft Wien. US Groβimachtpolitik gegenüber Österreich 1952–1962 (Vienna, 1994)Google Scholar.

8 Kirchschläger, , cited in Schlesinger, Thomas O., Austrian Neutrality in Post-war Europe: The Domestic Roots of a Foreign Policy (Vienna, 1972), 129Google Scholar.

9 More details and further references are in Grabbe, Hans-Jülrgen, “John Foster Dulles and West German-American Relations,” in John Foster Dulles and the Diplomacy of the Cold War, ed. Immerman, Richard H. (Princeton, N.J., 1990), 109–32Google Scholar.

10 Richard H. Davies to State Department, Aug. 26, 1953, National Archives (NA), Record Group (RG) 59 663.001/8–2653.

11 Concerning the most recent historiography on Gruber's policies, see Gehler, Michael, ed., Karl Gruber. Reden und Dokumente 1945–1953 (Vienna, 1993), 1134Google Scholar.

12 U.S. high commissioner for Austria, Thompson, Llewellyn, to the Department of State, Oct. 8, 1953, in foreign Relations of the United States, 1952–1954, vol. 7, Germany and Austria, part 2 (Washington, D.C., 1986)Google Scholar, 1908 (hereafter cited as FRUS 1952–1954).

13 With regard to this initiative, compare Stourzh, Gerald, Geschichte des Staatsvertrages 1945–1955. Österreichs Weg zur Neutraliät (Graz, 1985), 8190 and 322Google Scholar; see also Cronin, Great Power Politics, 125–27. As to the “neutrality option” and secret contacts with India, more details can be found in Stourzh, Gerald, “Towards the Settlement of 1955: The Austrian State Treaty Negotiations and the Origins of Austrian Neutrality,” Austrian History Yearbook 17–18 (19811982): 174–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14 Otto Seifert (member of the Austrian Liaison Office, Österreichische Verbindungsstelle), in Düsseldorf, British Zone of Germany, to Karl Gruber (foreign minister), July 13, 1953, Archiv der Republik (AdR), Bundeskanzleramt, Auswärtige Angelegenheiten (BKA, A A), II Pol 1953, box 242, Österreich 3, 3.318.770/53.

15 Josef Schöner (consul general, head of the Austrian Liaison Office in Düsseldorf) to Gruber, Sept. 15, 1953, AdR, BKA, AA, II Pol 1953, Box 231, Zl. Deutschland 2, 316.033.

16 Steininger, Rolf, The German Question: The Stalin Note of 1952 and the Problem of Reunification (New York, 1990)Google Scholar.

17 Specific references and analysis in Gehler, Michael, “Kurzvertrag für Österreich? Die westliche Staatsvertragsdiplomatie und die Stalin-Noten von 1952,” Vierteljahrshefte für Zeitgeschichte 42 (1994): 243–78Google Scholar.

18 Schöner to Leopold Figl (foreign minister), Apr. 9, 1955, AdR, BKA, AA, II Pol, Rußland 2, Zl. 321.280/53.

19 Thompson to State Department, July 11, 1953, NA, RG 59, 663.001/7–1153, p. 2.

20 Compare also Bischof, Günter, “The Anglo-American Powers and Austrian Neutrality, 1953–1955,” Mitleilungen des Österreichischen Staatsarchivs 42 (1992): 380–82Google Scholar.

21 FRUS 1952–1954, vol. 7, part 1, 1133.

22 Stourzh, Geschichte des Staatsvertrages, 131–32.

23 Del M. Odens to Llewellyn Thompson, Mar. 1, 1956, NA, RG 59, 763.5 MSP/8–2456.

24 Memo of Conversation (Julius Raab, Adolf Schärf, Alfred Puhan), July 16, 1955, NA, RG 59, Lot 58 D 72/58 D 223, box 7, p. 2.

25 Neuhold, Hanspeter, “The Permanent Neutrality of Austria,” in Neutrality and Non-Alignment in Europe, ed. Birnbaum, Karl E. and Neuhold, Hanspeter (Vienna, 1981), 55Google Scholar.

26 Vortrag an den Ministeriat, Feb. 15, 1956, Stiftung Bruno Kreisky Archiv (SBKA), Mikrofilm no. 1414, Mat. Staatssekretär, p. 4.

27 Karl Stephani (undersecretary for defense) to Schärf, Jan. 14, 1956 (copy in possession of the author).

28 NA, RG 59, 763.00/4–2655.

29 George Wallinger to Selwyn Lloyd, Annual Report for 1956, Jan. 24, 1957, Public Record Office, Foreign Office (PRO, FO) 371/130273 162343.

30 G. W. Harrison, Feb. 17, 1956, PRO, FO 371/124093 163124.

31 G. A. Crossley, Report on Austro-Yugoslav Relations, Feb. 7, 1956, PRO, FO 371/124093 163624.

32 George Wallinger to Macmillan, Nov. 4, 1955, PRO, FO 371/117780 163512.

33 Fernschreiben Hausenstein to AA Bonn, Apr. 20, 1955, Bundesarchiv Koblenz (BA), Nachlaβ Blankenhorn, Fiche 45b, 245.

34 Beam, Jacob D., An American Ambassador's Unique Perspective on East-West Issues (New York, 1978), 42Google Scholar.

35 Secretary of State to Department of State, in Foreign Relations of the United States, 1955–1957, vol. 5 (Washington, D.C., 1988), 181Google Scholar.

36 Thoß, Bruno, “Modellfall Österreich? Der österreichische Staatsvertrag und die deutsche Frage 1954/1955,” in Zwischen Kaltem Krieg und Entspannung. Sicherheits- und Deutschlandpolitik der Bundesrepublik im Mächtesystem der Jahre 1953–1956, ed. Thoß, Bruno and Volkmann, Hans-Erich (Boppard am Rhein, 1988), 136Google Scholar.

37 Rathkolb, Oliver, “Historische Bewährungsproben des Neutralitätsgesetzes 1955. Am Beispiel der US-Amerikanischen Österreich-Politik 1955 bis 1959,” in Verfassung. Juristisch-politische und sozialwissenschaftliche Beiträge anläβllich des 70-Jahr-Jubiläums des Bundesverfassungsgesetzes, ed. Dimmel, Nikolaus and Noll, Alfred-Johannes (Vienna, 1990), 122–41Google Scholar. The American escapee program was established to screen and interview refugees from Eastern European (Communist) countries in Austria primarily for intelligence reasons.

38 Raab, cited and translated by William Lloyd Stearman, The Soviet Union and the Occupation of Austria: An Analysis of Soviet Policy in Austria, 1945–1955 (Bonn, n.d.), 172.

39 The Soviet Military Bank had administered the finances of the USIA (Administration of Soviet Property in Austria, that is, seized former German property) industries, the Soviet Oil Administration, and the Danube Steamship Company.

40 Compare Rathkolb, Oliver, “Austria and European Integration after World War II,” Contemporary Austrian Studies 1 (1992): 46Google Scholar.

41 For more details, see Rauchensteiner, Manfried, Spätherbst 1956. Die Neutralität auf dent Prüf-stand (Vienna, 1981)Google Scholar.

42 Stourzh, Gerald, “The Origins of Austrian Neutrality,” in Neutrality: Changing Concepts and Practices, ed. Leonhard, Alan T. (Lanham, Md., 1988), 3840Google Scholar; Rathkolb, “Austria and European Integration,” 47–48.

43 For a broader analysis of the geopolitical crisis of 1956, see Calhoun, Daniel F., Hungary and Suez, 1956: An Exploration of Who Makes History (Lanham, Md., 1991)Google Scholar.

44 George Wallinger to Selwyn Lloyd, Annual Report for 1956, Jan. 24, 1957, PRO, FO 371/130273 162343.

46 Memorandum of Conversation (Wilfried Platzer, Austrian ambassador; Heinrich Haymerle, political director, Austrian Foreign Office; Frederick W. Jandrey, deputy assistant secretary, European Affairs), Dec. 8, 1958, NA, RG 59, 611.63/12–858, p. 2.

47 Memo of Conversation (Raab and Dulles), May 19, 1958, SBKA, Mat. State Secretary, U.S.A. The Vienna Memorandum of 1955 was intended to settle in bulk the claims of American, British, and Dutch oil companies under article 25 of the State Treaty (turnover of refineries, restoration of oil exploration rights prior to the Anschluß of 1938, and so on).

48 Hofbauer, Hannes, Westwärts. Österreichs Wirtschaft im Wiederaufbau (Vienna, 1992), 193Google Scholar.

49 Diaries of Fuchs, Martin, 10. 29, 1959, transcript (original in the Austrian Institute for Contemporary History, Vienna)Google Scholar.

50 Wiener Zeitung, June 5, 1958, 2, and June 18, 1958.

51 Translated in Stearman, The Soviet Union and Austria, 1 77.

52 NA, RG 59, 763.5-MSP/1–758, p. 2.

53 Concerning the Jews persecuted by the Nazi regime, compare Jellinek, Gustav, “Die Geschichte der österreichischen Wiedergutmachung,” in The Jews of Austria: Essays on Their Life, History and Destruction, ed. Fraenkel, Josef (London, 1967), 395426Google Scholar; Knight, Robert, “Restitution and Legitimacy in Post-War Austria, 1945–1953,” Leo Baeck Institute Yearbook 36 (1991): 413–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Bailer, Brigitte, Wiedergutmachung kein Thema. Österreich und die Offer des Nationalsozialismus (Vienna, 1993)Google Scholar.

54 Memo Robert Henry McBride to Livingston T. Merchant, Dec. 12, 1958, NA, RG 59, 611.63/12–1258, p. 1.

55 Gorove, Stephen, law and Politics of the Danube (The Hague, 1964), 131CrossRefGoogle Scholar, cited by Schlesinger, Austrian Neutrality, 120.

56 W. Tapley Bennett, Jr., to State Department, July 31, 1959, NA, RG 59, 763.13/7–3159, p. 1.

57 Ibid., 2.

58 Ibid., 1.

59 Kreisky, cited by Bielka, Erich, “Österreich und seine volksdemokratischen Nachbarn,” in Die Ära Kreisky. Schwerpunkte der österreichischen Auβenpolitik, ed. Bielka, Erich, Jankowitsch, Peter, and Thalberg, Hans (Vienna, 1983), 203Google Scholar.

60 C. D. Jackson Papers, Youth Festival Vienna, Dwight D. Eisenhower Library, Abilene, Kansas.

61 John W. Fisher, first secretary, Biographic Report on Austrian Foreign Minister Dr. Bruno Kreisky, NA, RG 59, 763.521/8–2859, p. 7.

62 Diaries of Martin Fuchs, July 30 and Sept. 2, 1958, transcript (original in the Austrian Institute for Contemporary History).

63 Fisher, Report, 8. Compare on this topic the extensive article by Küsters, Hanns Jürgen, “Adenauer und Brandt in der Berlin-Krise 1958–1963,” Vierteljahrshefte für Zeitgeschichte 40 (1992): 483542Google Scholar.

64 Thalberg, Hans J., Von der Kunst, Österreicher zu sein, Erinnerungen und Tagebuchnotizen (Vienna, 1984), 256Google Scholar.

65 Compare Höll, Otmar, “The Foreign Policy of the Kreisky Era,” Contemporary Austrian Studies 2 (1993): 3942Google Scholar, and Oliver Rathkolb, “Bruno Kreisky: Perspectives of Top Level U.S. Foreign Policy Decision Makers, 1959–1983,” ibid., 132–34.

66 Beschloss, Michael R., The Crisis Years: Kennedy and Khrushchev, 1960–1963 (New York, 1991), 533Google Scholar. “Ex Comm” was the Executive Committee of the National Security Council in the Kennedy Administration.

67 Schlesinger, Memorandum for the President, Oct. 11, 1963, John F. Kennedy Library, Boston, Papers of President Kennedy, President's Office Files, box 111.

68 Diaries of Fuchs, Martin, 10. 29, 1959, transcript (original in the Austrian Institute for Contemporary History)Google Scholar.

69 Neue Tageszeitung, Dec. 6, 1959.

70 For more details about the approach of the Kennedy administration to the neutrals Sweden, Switzerland, and Austria, see the unpublished papers of the conference “The First Attempt to Enlarge the European Community, 1961–63,” European University Institute, Florence, Feb. 17–19, 1994, and especially David L. Dileo, “George Ball and the First British Application to the European Economic Community,” and Corso Paolo Boccia, “The Kennedy Administration and the First Attempt to Enlarge the European Communities, 1961–1963.” The latter two papers, based on extensive archival material, should be published soon, edited by Richard Griffiths.

71 Rathkolb, “Austria and European Integration,” 51.

72 Briefing Paper for President's Meeting with Austrian Chancellor, Apr. 26, 1962, Declassified Documents Collection 1978, B.393 (original in the Lyndon B. Johnson Library, Austin, Texas).

73 ”Wiener Lob und Kritik der deutschen Außenpolitik,” Politisches Archiv des Auswärtigen Amtes, Bonn, Ref. 203, vol. 113.

74 For a comprehensive comparison of Austrian and Swiss neutrality, see Jenny, Christian, Bündnisfreiheit oder Neutralität? Die österreichische Neutralität und ihr Schweizer Muster—ein Verifikalionsversuch (Lizentiatsarbeit an der Philosophisch-historischen Fakultät, Universitat Bern, 1993)Google Scholar.

75 Kissinger, Henry, Diptomacy (New York, 1994), 734Google Scholar, referring to Brandt's analysis of the role of de Gaulle.

76 Oliver Rathkolb, “De Gaulle im Spiegel österreichischer Außenpolitik 1958/59–1965,” Jahrbuch für Zeitgeschichte 1990/91, 85–92.