Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-31T13:04:09.342Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sustainability and Small to Medium Sized Enterprises - How to Engage Them

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2015

Linda Condon*
Affiliation:
Swinburne University of Technology
*
Manager, National Centre for Sustainability, Swinburne University of Technology, Wakefield Street, Hawthorn, Victoria 3122, Australia. Email: lcondon@swin.edu.au

Abstract

Small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) have a major advantage over larger organisations in regard to addressing sustainability issues – their size means they are able to react very quickly to changes in the business environment. They are disadvantaged, however, by lack of information on marketplace changes that make sustainability an opportunity to innovate, and to inspire employees. While some SMEs are leaders in sustainable practices, others lack the sort of strategic mindset which views changes in the business environment as opportunities – seeing the tasks which require more change as an additional burden, rather than a source of potential advantage.

The National Centre for Sustainability has worked with a group of SMEs (with sponsorship through a Research Agreement with Sensis) in a series of workshop environments. Through this work a set of indicators was developed to measure their progress towards more sustainable practices. Key members of industry associations and government agencies were engaged in an advisory capacity to ensure that the work undertaken was relevant and innovative.

In addition, a comprehensive industry research study was undertaken to determine the key priorities for business and government relating to sustainability. This work provided insight into the needs and trends in sustainable practices in various sectors including manufacturing, service industry, education and government. The outcomes of the research have determined the need to develop flexible, adult centric and work-based learning models to educate for sustainability and create organisational change.

This paper explores the value of innovative and engaging educational practices to create an environment which is most conducive to facilitating the implementation of economic, environmental and social aspects ofwork practices.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atkins, W. S. (2002). NetRegs benchmarking Survey. A snapshot of environmental awareness and practice in small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs). Retrieved September 2004, from www.environment-agency.gov.uk/netregs.Google Scholar
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2002). 1321.0 Small Business in Australia 23/10/2002.Google Scholar
Blake, J. (1999). Overcoming the “value-action gap” in environmental policy: tensions between national policy and local experience, Local Environment, 4(3), 257278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cleverdon, J. (2003). The Challenge of Corporate Social Responsibility. Business in the Community October 2003. Retrieved September 2004, from http://www.bitc.org.uk/go.rm?id=6005.Google Scholar
Condon, L. (2003). Business Sustainability Indicators for SMEs Report, National Centre for Sustainability (unpublished).Google Scholar
Ecobody, (2002). Awakening Calls, Waste & Environment Today. Retrieved September 2004, from http://www.ecobody.com/views6.htmlGoogle Scholar
Gardner, G. T., & Stern, P. C. (1996). Environmental problems and human behavior. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Hart, S. L., & Ahuja, G. (1996, 03). Does It Pay to Be Green? An Empirical Examination of the Relationship Between Emission Reduction and Firm Performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 5(1), 3037.3.0.CO;2-Q>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knowles, M. (1980). The modern practice of adult education: from pedagogy to andragogy. New York: Cambridge Books.Google Scholar
Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the Gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maiteny, P. (2002). Mind in the Gap: summary ofresearch exploring “inner” influences on pro-sustainability learning and behaviour. Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 299306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mancuso, S. (2000). Adult Learner-centered Institutions: Best Practices for the 21st Century. Western Washington University, USA.Google Scholar
Mezinow, J. (1991). Transformative Dimensions of Adult Learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Mezinow, J. (date). Understanding Transformational Theory. Adult Education Quarterly, 41(4), 222232.Google Scholar
McKenzie-Mohr, D. (2000). Promoting Sustainable Behavior: An Introduction to Community-Based Social Marketing. Journal ofSocial Issues (issue numbers)Google Scholar
Revell, A., & Rutherfoord, R. (2003). UK environmental policy and the small firm: broadening the focus Business Strategy and the Environment, 12, 2635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar