Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-31T13:05:16.550Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Passio Sanctorum Quattuor Coronatorum: a petrological approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

D. P. S. Peacock
D. P. S. Peacock*
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, England
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A geological look at the hard evidence of Roman stone in central Europe illuminates a major documentary source for the human experience of Roman quarrying.

Type
Notes
Information
Antiquity , Volume 69 , Issue 263 , June 1995 , pp. 362 - 368
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Behn, F. 1926. Steinindustrie des Altertums. Mainz. Google Scholar
Bendorff, O. 1870. Archaeologische Bemerkungen, in Büdinger, M. Untersuchungen zur römischen Kaisergeschichte 3: 339–56. Leipzig. Google Scholar
Bingen, J., Bülow-Jacobsen, A., Cockle, W.E.H., Cuvigny, H., Rubinstein, L. & Van Rengen, L.W. 1992. Möns Claudianus: Ostraca Graeca et Latina 1 (O. Claud. 1 à90). Cairo: Institut Français d’Archéologie Orientale.Google Scholar
Bulić, E. 1908a. Materiale e provenienza della pietra, delle colonne, nonche delle sfingi del Palazzo di Diocletiano a Spalato e delle colonne ecc. delle basiliche cristiane a Salona, Bull. Arch. Storia Dalmatia, 8(31): 86–110.Google Scholar
Bulić, E. 1908b. Proviene qualche cosa nel Palazzo di Diocletiano a Spalato, per es. qualche colonne, qualche pezzo architettonico od ornamentale. qualche statua, dalle lapidicine di Sirmium (Fruška Gora nella Slavonia)?, Bull. Arch. Storia Dalmatia, 8(31): 111–27.Google Scholar
Davies, E. 1958. Condemnation to the mines: aneglected chapter in the history of persecutions, Univ. Birm. Hist. J., 6: 20.Google Scholar
Delbrueck, R. 1932. Antike Porphyrwerke. Berlin/Leipzig. Google Scholar
Delehaye, H. 1910. Passio SS Quattuor Coronatoim Auctore Porphyrio. Acta Sanctorum. Dies Octavus Novembris.Google Scholar
Von Karajan, H. 1853. Über die vorstehende Legende. Österreiche Akad Wiss. Sitzungberichte 10: 115–26.Google Scholar
Kirsch, J.P. 1917. Die Passio der heiligen ‘Vier Gekronten’ in Rom, Hist. Jb. 38: 72–96.Google Scholar
Koch, G. 1993. Sarkophage derrömischen Kaiseneif. Darmstatt.Google Scholar
Köstekmann, E. 1953. Der Pannonisch-Dalmatinische Krieg 6-9n. Chr., Hermes 81: 345–78.Google Scholar
Kraus, T., Röder, J. & Müllek-Wiener, W. 1967. Mons Claudianus — Möns Porphyrites. Bericht über die zweite Forschungsreise 1964, Mitt. deutsch Inst. Kairo 22: 108–205.Google Scholar
Lucci, M.L. 1964. II porfido nell’antichità, Arch. Class. 18: 226–71.Google Scholar
Millar, F. 1984. Condemnation to hard labour in the Roman Empire, from the Julio-Claudians to Constantine, Proceedings of the British School at Borne. 52: 124–47.Google Scholar
Nagy, T. 1939. A pannóníniai kereszténység története a római védörendszer összeomlásáig. Budapest. (= Diss. Pann. ser. II 12)Google Scholar
Papp, F. 1938. Szent István korabeli építökövek a Dunántúlról, Teknika. 19. 359–63.Google Scholar
Peacock, D.P.S. 1993. Rome in the desert: a symbol of power. Inaugural lecture, University of Southampton.Google Scholar
Peacock, D.P.S. & Maxfied, V.A. 1994. The Roman imperial porphyry quarries: Gebel Dokhan, Egypt. Interim report 1994. Southampton & Exeter.Google Scholar
Peacock, D.P.S. & Williams-Thorrpe, O., Thokpe, R.S. Tindle, A.G. 1994. Mons Claudianus and the problem of the ‘granito del foro’: a geological and geochemical approach Antiquity 68: 209–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scaife, C.H.O. 1934. A note on certain inscriptions at Gebel Dokhan, and on a small station, hitherto unrecorded, on the road from Kainopolis to Myos Hormos, Bull. Fuc. Arts Fouad I Univ. 2: 106–30.Google Scholar
Scaife, C.H.O. 1935. Two inscriptions at Mons Porphyrites (Gehel Dokhan), also a description, with plans, of the stations between Kainnpolis and Myos Hormos together with some other ruins in the neighbourhood of Gebel Dokhan, Bull. Fac. Arts Fouad I Univ. 2: 58–104.Google Scholar
Schneider, O. 1883. £ber den roten Porphyr der Alten, in O. Schneider, Naturwissenschaftliche Beitrage zur Geographie and Kulturgeschichte. 75–176. Dresden.Google Scholar
Sewter, E.R.A. 1969. The Alexiad of Anna Comnena. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Sidebotham, S.E. Zittekkopf, R.E. & Riley, J.A. 1991. Survey of the ‘Abu Sha’ar-Nile road, American Journal ol Archaeology 95: 571–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonyi, D. 1960. Sull’origine del toponymo ‘Quinque Ecclesiae’ di Pécs, Acta Ant. Hung 8: 165–84.Google Scholar
Vasiliev, A.A. 1948. Imperial porphyry sarcophagi in Constantinople, Dumbarton Oaks Popers 4: 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vulií, N. 1934. Passio IV coronatori™, Glas 160: 1–22.Google Scholar
Vulií, N. 1935. Quelques observations sur la Passio sanctorum quattuor coronatorum, Bull. Acad. Let. Belgrade 211–15.Google Scholar
Ward-Perkins, B. 1980(1992). Nicomedia and the marble trade, republished in Dodge, H. & Ward-Perkins, B. (ed.), Marble in antiquity. Collected papers of J.B. Ward-Perkins: chapter 9. Rome: British School at Rome. Arch,aeological Monographs 6.Google Scholar
Wattenbach, W. 1896. £ber die Legende von den heiligen Vier Gekrönten, Sitzungsb. kön. Preuss. Akad. Wiss.: 1281–92.Google Scholar
Williams-Thorpe, O. & Thorpe, R.S. 1993. Magnetic susceptibility used in non-destructive provenancing of Roman granite columns, Archaeometry. 35 185–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wollman, V. 1974. Certetari privind carierele di piatra din Dacia romana, Sargetia. 10 : 105–30.Google Scholar